Comparison of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and placebo for treatment of septic preterm infants
- PMID: 12442030
- DOI: 10.1097/00006454-200211000-00017
Comparison of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and placebo for treatment of septic preterm infants
Abstract
Background: To reduce morbidity and mortality adjuvant cytokine therapy was administered to septic neonates with variable results. The objective of this case series was to compare the effectiveness of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF) and recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) with that of placebo in correcting neutropenia induced by sepsis.
Methods: Symptomatic, septic premature neonates with or without a positive blood culture were eligible. Twenty-eight patients were randomized: 10 received rG-CSF (5 microg/kg/dose i.v. twice a day); 10 received rhuGM-CSF (4 microg/kg/dose i.v. twice a day) and 8 received placebo for a maximum of 7 days, or until an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 10,000 cells/mm was reached.
Results: A significant increase in the ANC above the baseline was present on Day 2 in the rG-CSF group (P = 0.015) and on Day 5 in the rhuGM-CSF (P = 0.002) and placebo (P = 0.027) groups. The ANC of the rG-CSF group was significantly above that in the rhuGM-CSF and placebo groups on Day 7 (P = 0.03). Mortality and neonatal intensive care unit morbidity was not significantly different between the groups.
Conclusion: The neutrophil count in the rG-CSF-treated group increased significantly faster than that in the placebo or rhuGM-CSF group.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical