Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002;205(4):362-6.
doi: 10.1159/000066436.

Melanoma detection. A prospective study comparing diagnosis with the naked eye, dermatoscopy and telespectrophotometry

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Melanoma detection. A prospective study comparing diagnosis with the naked eye, dermatoscopy and telespectrophotometry

Aldo Bono et al. Dermatology. 2002.

Abstract

Background: Successful treatment of melanoma depends directly on early diagnosis. Such a diagnosis is based on clinical examination and dermatoscopy. Recently, automated instruments for melanoma detection are under development.

Objective: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic possibilities provided by clinical and dermatoscopic examinations and by a computerized telespectrophotometric system (TS).

Methods: The study involves a consecutive series of 298 patients with 313 cutaneous pigmented lesions (66 melanomas and 247 non-melanoma lesions). Each lesion was subjected to the triple diagnostic evaluation, before surgery. Results were expressed in terms of sensitivity and specificity of each kind of evaluation.

Results: Clinical evaluation had sensitivity and specificity values of 86 and 77%, respectively, whereas dermatoscopy gave corresponding values of 91 and 74%. TS assessment resulted in a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 49%. Differences between clinical and dermatoscopic diagnoses lacked statistical significance (p = 0.22), whereas there was a significant difference comparing both clinical and TS evaluations (p < 0.01) and dermatoscopic and TS evaluations (p < 0.01). Combining clinical and dermatoscopic evaluations, a sensitivity of 97% was achieved. Addition of TS has not changed this figure.

Conclusions: Results of this study confirm and stress the importance of dermatoscopy in the diagnosis of melanoma. Clinical evaluation coupled with dermatoscopy can be considered the cornerstone of such a diagnosis. Although TS is able to achieve interesting results, at present it cannot significantly compete with any of the other tested methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources