Intravascular extraction of permanent pacemaker leads
- PMID: 12444429
- DOI: 10.1007/s005950200190
Intravascular extraction of permanent pacemaker leads
Abstract
Purpose: Cardiac leads that became infected, fail, or are otherwise problematic present difficulties in the management of patients. In this report, we assess our intravascular countertraction technique.
Method: Between February 1990 and January 2001, 13 leads were removed from 11 patients using the intravascular countertraction technique. The reasons for lead extraction were pacemaker infection and lead dysfunction.
Results: In two of these patients, the ventricular leads could not be completely removed. The complete success rate was 85% and the overall success rate was 92%. There were no serious complications such as cardiac rupture, vein injury, or death, and there were no clinical signs of pulmonary embolism. In one of the patients whose ventricular leads could not be removed completely, the ventricular lead was stretched from its previous round shape, but tricuspid valve regurgitation did not occur during the 3-year follow-up period. In the other patient, the distal electrode was left in the subclavian vein. However, this residual distal electrode did not migrate, and there were no clinical signs of any recurrence of infection.
Conclusions: The present study suggests that to remove leads successfully, the largest locking stylet that can be easily passed to the lead's tip through the coil lumen should be chosen in order to avoid valve injury, which can sometimes occur when a ventricular lead's locking stylet is left in the coil lumen.
Similar articles
-
Less-invasive surgical extraction of problematic or infected permanent transvenous pacemaker system.Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Apr;79(4):1250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.08.055. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005. PMID: 15797058
-
Laser-assisted extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads: the role of the cardiac surgeon.Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 May;87(5):1446-50; discussion 1450-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.015. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19379883
-
Laser lead extraction: predictors of success and complications.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Feb;30(2):214-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00652.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17338718 Clinical Trial.
-
[Removal of infected pacemaker leads under extracorporeal circulation].Kyobu Geka. 2007 Nov;60(12):1074-8. Kyobu Geka. 2007. PMID: 18018649 Review. Japanese.
-
Intravascular lead extraction using the excimer laser: pitfalls and tips for success.Semin Vasc Surg. 2008 Mar;21(1):54-6. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2007.11.004. Semin Vasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18342737 Review.
Cited by
-
A novel technique for removal of permanent pacemaker leads.Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Feb;52(2):75-7. doi: 10.1007/s11748-004-0088-x. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004. PMID: 14997976
-
Entire removal of screw-in pacing leads 3 years after implantation.J Rural Med. 2011;6(1):35-7. doi: 10.2185/jrm.6.35. J Rural Med. 2011. PMID: 25648192 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical