Meta-analysis of relaparotomy for secondary peritonitis
- PMID: 12445059
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02293.x
Meta-analysis of relaparotomy for secondary peritonitis
Abstract
Background: Planned relaparotomy and relaparotomy on demand are two frequently employed surgical treatment strategies for patients with abdominal sepsis.
Methods: The available literature was evaluated to compare the efficacy of both surgical treatment strategies. A systematic search for studies comparing planned and on-demand relaparotomy strategies in adult patients with secondary peritonitis was employed. Studies were reviewed independently for design features, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and outcomes. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality.
Results: No randomized studies were found; eight observational studies with a total of 1266 patients (planned relaparotomy, 286; relaparotomy on demand, 980) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. These eight studies were heterogeneous on clinical and statistical grounds (chi2= 40.7, d.f. = 7, P < 0.001). Using a random-effects approach, the combined odds ratio for in-hospital mortality was 0.70 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.27 to 1.80) in favour of the on-demand strategy.
Conclusion: The combined results of observational studies show a statistically non-significant reduction in mortality for the on-demand relaparotomy strategy compared with the planned relaparotomy strategy when corrected for heterogeneity in a random-effects model. Owing to the non-randomized nature of the studies, the limited number of patients per study, and the heterogeneity between studies, the overall evidence generated by the eight studies was inconclusive.
Comment in
-
Meta-analysis of relaparotomy for secondary peritonitis (Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1516-1524).Br J Surg. 2003 Mar;90(3):369. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4157. Br J Surg. 2003. PMID: 12594681 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous