Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance determination of flow reserve
- PMID: 12446070
- DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02491-9
Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance determination of flow reserve
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-determined graft flow and flow reserve in differentiating significant from non-significant vein graft disease.
Background: In patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), non-invasive testing may be helpful in the detection of recurrent graft disease.
Methods: Randomly selected patients (n = 21) scheduled for X-ray angiography because of recurrent chest complaints after CABG were included for evaluation of vein grafts (n = 40) by CMR. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced CMR angiography was performed and followed by flow measurements at rest and during hyperemia in patent grafts only. Flow reserve was calculated when resting flow exceeded 20 ml/min. Analysis was based on four categories defined by X-ray angiography: occluded grafts (n = 3), grafts with stenosis >50% (n = 19), grafts with stenosis <50% with diseased graft run-off (n = 8), and grafts with stenosis <50% and normal run-off (n = 10).
Results: The CMR angiography demonstrated occlusion of three grafts. In nine of the 37 patent grafts, basal blood flow was <20 ml/min, all demonstrating significant stenosis at X-ray angiography. In grafts with resting flow >20 ml/min (n = 28), flow reserve significantly differed between grafts without stenosis and grafts with significant stenosis or with diseased run-off (2.5 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.9, p = 0.04). An algorithm combining basal volume flow <20 ml/min and graft flow reserve <2 had a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 80% respectively for detecting grafts with significant stenosis or diseased run-off.
Conclusions: This feasibility study showed that quantification of flow and flow reserve by CMR may serve as a non-invasive adjunct to differentiate between vein grafts without stenosis and grafts with significant stenosis or diseased run-off.
Similar articles
-
Functional significance of stenoses in coronary artery bypass grafts. Evaluation by single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and angiography.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Nov 2;44(9):1877-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.048. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004. PMID: 15519022
-
Fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: can intraoperative physiologic imaging guide decision making?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Oct;146(4):824-835.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.026. Epub 2013 Aug 1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23915918
-
Evaluation of saphenous vein coronary artery bypass graft flow by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005;7(4):631-7. doi: 10.1081/jcmr-65591. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005. PMID: 16136852
-
Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts.Circulation. 2004 May 4;109(17):2086-91. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127570.20508.5C. Circulation. 2004. PMID: 15123539 Review.
-
[MR angiography and flow measurement in coronary arteries and coronary bypass grafts].Z Kardiol. 2001 Dec;90(12):929-38. doi: 10.1007/s003920170063. Z Kardiol. 2001. PMID: 11826834 Review. German.
Cited by
-
MRI in the detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts: are invasive techniques still needed?Neth Heart J. 2003 Jan;11(1):1-4. Neth Heart J. 2003. PMID: 25696137 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical