Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Oct-Dec;15(4):347-54.
doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(02)80006-0.

Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV)

Affiliations

Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV)

Martine M Veehof et al. J Hand Ther. 2002 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric qualities (internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity) of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV) in patients (n = 50) with a variety of unilateral disorders of the upper limb. All patients completed the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and the DASH-DLV before receiving occupational therapy. After therapy, patients again filled in the DASH-DLV. The internal consistency of the DASH-DLV was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), and the test-retest reliability was satisfactory (Pearson's r = 0.98, p < 0.0001 kappa coefficient = 0.67, p < 0.0001). A small but statistically significant difference (effect size = 0.09) was found between the initial and reassessment DASH-DLV scores (paired t-test p < 0.01). The concurrent validity of the DASH-DLV was assessed by comparison with the COPM outcomes: 81% of the problematic activities mentioned during COPM administration were included in the questionnaire (kappa coefficient = 0.79, p < 0.0001). The DASH-DLV is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing disability and symptoms in a selected sampling of 50 Dutch patients with a variety of unilateral upper limb disorders. Further psychometric testing is recommended in a larger random population of Dutch-speaking subjects with unilateral upper limb disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types