Experimental tests of the cellular tensegrity hypothesis
- PMID: 12454408
Experimental tests of the cellular tensegrity hypothesis
Abstract
The tensegrity model depicts the cytoskeleton (CSK) as a prestressed network of interconnected filaments. The prestress is generated by the CSK contractile apparatus and is partly balanced by traction at the cell-substrate interface and partly by CSK internal compression elements such as microtubules (MTs). A key feature of tensegrity is that the shear modulus (G) must increase in proportion with the prestress. Here we have tested that prediction as well as the idea that compression of MTs balance a portion of the cell prestress. Airway smooth muscle cells were studied. Traction microscopy was used to calculate traction. Because traction must be balanced by the stress within the cell, the prestress could be computed. Cell G was measured by oscillatory magnetic cytometry. The prestress was modulated using graded concentrations of contracting (histamine) or relaxing (isoproterenol) agonists and by disrupting MTs by colchicine. It was found that G increased in proportion with the prestress and that compression of MTs balanced a significant, but a relatively small fraction of the prestress. Taken together, these results do not disprove other models of cell deformability, nor they prove tensegrity. However, they do support a priori predictions of tensegrity. As such, it may not be necessary to invoke more complex mechanisms to explain these central features of cell deformability.
Similar articles
-
The role of prestress and architecture of the cytoskeleton and deformability of cytoskeletal filaments in mechanics of adherent cells: a quantitative analysis.J Theor Biol. 1999 Nov 7;201(1):63-74. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1014. J Theor Biol. 1999. PMID: 10534436
-
Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells.Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002 Mar;282(3):C606-16. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00269.2001. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002. PMID: 11832346
-
Cell prestress. II. Contribution of microtubules.Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002 Mar;282(3):C617-24. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00271.2001. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002. PMID: 11832347
-
Models of cytoskeletal mechanics of adherent cells.Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2002 Jun;1(1):95-108. doi: 10.1007/s10237-002-0009-9. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2002. PMID: 14586710 Review.
-
[Mechanotransduction and tensegrity (I)].Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 1998 Jul-Dec;102(3-4):25-35. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 1998. PMID: 10756840 Review. Romanian.
Cited by
-
Biotensegrity of the extracellular matrix: physiology, dynamic mechanical balance, and implications in oncology and mechanotherapy.Front Oncol. 2014 Mar 4;4:39. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00039. eCollection 2014. Front Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24624363 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials