Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome
- PMID: 12454514
- PMCID: PMC1422642
- DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000036269.60340.AE
Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome
Abstract
Objective: The primary endpoint was to compare the impact of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery on 30-day postoperative morbidity. Lymphocyte proliferation to mitogens and gut oxygen tension were surrogate endpoints.
Summary background data: Evidence-based proof of the effect of laparoscopic colorectal surgery on immunometabolic response and clinically relevant outcome variables is scanty. Further randomized trials are desirable before proposing laparoscopy as a superior technique.
Methods: Two hundred sixty-nine patients with colorectal disease were randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 136) or open (n = 133) colorectal resection. Four trained members of the surgical staff who were not involved in the study registered postoperative complications. Lymphocyte proliferation to Candida albicans and phytohemagglutinin was evaluated before and 3 and 15 days after surgery. Operative gut oxygen tension was monitored continuously by a polarographic microprobe.
Results: In the laparoscopic group the conversion rate was 5.1%. The overall morbidity rate was 20.6% in the laparoscopic group and 38.3% in the open group. Postoperative infections occurred in 15 of the 136 patients in the laparoscopic group and 31 of the 133 patients in the open group. The mean length of hospital stay was 10.4 +/- 2.9 days in the laparoscopic group and 12.5 +/- 4.1 days in the open group. On postoperative day 3, lymphocyte proliferation was impaired in both groups. Fifteen days after surgery, the proliferation index returned to baseline values only in the laparoscopic group. Intraoperative gut oxygen tension was higher in the laparoscopic than in the open group.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery resulted in a significant reduction of 30-day postoperative morbidity. Lymphocyte proliferation and gut oxygen tension were better preserved in the laparoscopic group than in the open group.
Figures




References
-
- Wexner SD, Reissman P, Pfeifer J, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis of 140 cases. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 133–136. - PubMed
-
- Bruch HP, Schiedeck TH, Schwandner O. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A five-year experience. Dig Surg 1999; 16: 45–54. - PubMed
-
- Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, et al. Metabolic and functional results after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1070–1077. - PubMed
-
- Hewitt PM, IP SM, Kwok SP, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer: comparative study of immune effects. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 901–909. - PubMed
-
- Nishiguchi K, Okuda J, Toyoda M, et al. Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopic and open surgeries for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 223–230. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical