Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Oct;55(8):969-75.

Renal cell carcinoma in young adults: incidence, disease outcome and review of the literature

Affiliations
  • PMID: 12455292
Review

Renal cell carcinoma in young adults: incidence, disease outcome and review of the literature

Alejandro Rodríguez et al. Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To study the incidence, clinical presentation and pathological prognostic factors affecting disease outcome of RCC in young adults less than 40 years old.

Methods: The charts o medical records of 400 patients treated surgically for RCC between January 1984 and December 1999 were reviewed. 29 (7.25%) patients were under 40. We used ANOVA regression and Chisquare (Fisher exact test) to assess the prognostic value of the quantitative and qualitative variables, respectively. Estimation of the survival distributions were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier method and compared with Log rank test. Multivariate analysis of the entire population utilizing Cox models was performed.

Results: The most common histological cell type was clear cell carcinoma, found in 20 (69%) patients. At a median follow-up of 80 months, 20 (69%) patients were disease free and 9 (31%) died of the disease. Incidental discovery (p = 0.05), tumor stage (p = 0.043), grade (p = 0.011), lymphatic invasion (p < 0.0001) metastasis (p = 0.003), adrenal invasion (p = 0.024), and renal vein invasion (p < 0.0001) were associated with prognosis (Kaplan-Meier). When comparing patients less than 40 years vs. older than 40 years, we found significant differences in histology type (clear cell carcinoma 69% vs. 91%; p = 0.0001), and tumor stage at presentation (pT2 = 34.5% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.04) (pT3 = 20.7% vs. 42%; p = 0.03). Disease free survival was not significantly different between the two groups (69% vs. 65.7%; Log rank test p = 0.4).

Conclusion: Although rare, RCC in young adults seems to follow a course similar to the disease seen in older patients. Among the prognostic factors studied incidental discovery, pathological stage of the tumor and grade, were associated with survival. Stage at presentation was different between the two populations however survival was not affected by age.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources