Similar articles

• ADEMEX: a landmark peritoneal dialysis study. Should we change our practice?

  Blake P. Blake P. Perit Dial Int. 2002 Sep-Oct;22(5):545. Perit Dial Int. 2002. PMID: 12455561 No abstract available.
• The negative results of the ADEMEX study may be positive for peritoneal dialysis. time for a paradigm shift in the focus of peritoneal dialysis adequacy? Adequacy of Peritoneal Dialysis in Mexico.

  Heimbürger O. Heimbürger O. Perit Dial Int. 2002 Sep-Oct;22(5):546-8. Perit Dial Int. 2002. PMID: 12455562 No abstract available.
• Beyond CANUSA, DOQI, ADEMEX: what's next? Adequacy of Peritoneal Dialysis in Mexico. Canada-USA. Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative.

  Wang T, Lindholm B. Wang T, et al. Perit Dial Int. 2002 Sep-Oct;22(5):555-62. Perit Dial Int. 2002. PMID: 12455565 No abstract available.
• Peritoneal dialysis practice in Australia and New Zealand: A call to sustain the action.

  Mudge DW, Boudville N, Brown F, Clayton P, Duddington M, Holt S, Johnson DW, Jose M, Saweirs W, Sud K, Voss D, Walker R. Mudge DW, et al. Nephrology (Carlton). 2016 Jul;21(7):535-46. doi: 10.1111/nep.12731. Nephrology (Carlton). 2016. PMID: 26807739 Review.
• The implications of the ADEMEX study for the peritoneal dialysis prescription: the role of small solute clearance versus salt and water removal.

  McCormick BB, Bargman JM. McCormick BB, et al. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2003 Nov;12(6):581-5. doi: 10.1097/00041552-200311000-00002. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2003. PMID: 14564193 Review.