Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Nov 30;325(7375):1265.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1265.

Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review

Emma L Simpson  1 , Allan O House
Affiliations

Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review

Emma L Simpson et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To identify evidence from comparative studies on the effects of involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services.

Data sources: English language articles published between January 1966 and October 2001 found by searching electronic databases.

Study selection: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials and other comparative studies of involving users in the delivery or evaluation of mental health services.

Data extraction: Patterns of delivery of services by employees who use or who used to use the service and professional employees and the effects on trainees, research, or clients of mental health services.

Results: Five randomised controlled trials and seven other comparative studies were identified. Half of the studies considered involving users in managing cases. Involving users as employees of mental health services led to clients having greater satisfaction with personal circumstances and less hospitalisation. Providers of services who had been trained by users had more positive attitudes toward users. Clients reported being less satisfied with services when interviewed by users.

Conclusions: Users can be involved as employees, trainers, or researchers without detrimental effect. Involving users with severe mental disorders in the delivery and evaluation of services is feasible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Mental Health Task Force User Group. Forging our futures: lighting the fire. London: Department of Health; 1995.
    1. NHS Health Advisory Service. Voices in partnership: involving users and carers in commissioning and delivering mental health services. London: Stationery Office; 1997.
    1. Department of Health. National service framework for mental health modern standards and service models. London: DoH; 1999.
    1. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness. CRD. 2001.
    1. O'Donnell M, Parker G, Proberts M, Matthews R, Fisher D, Johnson B, et al. A study of client-focused case management and consumer advocacy: the community and consumer service project. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1999;33:684–693. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms