Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results
- PMID: 12460222
- PMCID: PMC5142735
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00194.x
Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results
Abstract
Objective: To determine women's preferences for and reported experience with medical test decision-making.
Design: Computer-assisted telephone survey.
Setting and participants: Six hundred and fifty-two women resident in households randomly selected from the New South Wales electronic white pages.
Main outcome measures: Reported and preferred test and treatment (for comparison) decision-making, satisfaction with and anxiety about information on false results and side-effects; and effect of anxiety on desire for such information.
Results: Overall most women preferred to share test (94.6%) and treatment (91.2%) decision-making equally with their doctor, or to take a more active role, with only 5.4-8.9% reporting they wanted the doctor to make these decisions on their behalf. This pattern was consistent across all age groups. In general, women reported experiencing a decision-making role that was consistent with their preference. Women who had a usual doctor were more likely to report experiencing an active role in decision-making. More women reported receiving as much information as they wanted about the benefits of tests and treatment than about the side-effects of tests and treatment. Most women wanted information about the possibility of false test results (91.5%) and test side-effects (95.6%), but many reported the doctor never provided this information (false results = 40.0% and side-effects = 31.3%). A substantial proportion said this information would make them anxious (false results = 56.6% and side-effects = 43.1%), but reported they wanted the information anyway (false results = 77.6% and side-effects = 88.1%).
Conclusions: Women prefer an active role in test and treatment decision-making. Many women reported receiving inadequate information. If so, this may jeopardize informed decision-making.
References
-
- Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 1997; 2: 112 – 121. - PubMed
-
- Emmanuel EJ, Emmanuel LL. Four models of the physician‐patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1992; 267: 2221 – 2226. - PubMed
-
- Entwistle V, Sheldon TA, Sowden A, Watt IS. Evidence‐informed patient choice. Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1998; 14: 212 – 225. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
