The efficacy and safety of linezolid as treatment for Staphylococcus aureus infections in compassionate use patients who are intolerant of, or who have failed to respond to, vancomycin
- PMID: 12461026
- DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkf215
The efficacy and safety of linezolid as treatment for Staphylococcus aureus infections in compassionate use patients who are intolerant of, or who have failed to respond to, vancomycin
Abstract
Objective: The incidence of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus continues to increase annually. Unfortunately, only a few therapeutic agents are available for the treatment of patients with such infections and all of the existing drugs have limitations. A pressing need exists, therefore, to identify new antibiotics for use in this clinical setting. The efficacy and safety of linezolid were studied in a compassionate use treatment programme and the results of treating a subset of patients with S. aureus infections are presented here.
Methods: Patients received linezolid in a dosage of 600 mg intravenously (iv) and/or orally twice daily. Clinical and bacteriological responses were assessed after a minimum of 7 days and following completion of therapy.
Results: Seven hundred and ninety-six patients who suffered 828 episodes of infection were enrolled in the linezolid compassionate use protocol. Of these, 183 patients received linezolid for 191 infections caused by S. aureus; in 151 cases, patients were intolerant of vancomycin, had a mixed S. aureus/vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection or had no iv access, and, in 40 cases, patients had failed to respond to treatment with vancomycin. The median age of the patients was 57 years (range 14-93 years) and 53.9% were female. The predominant sites of infection were as follows: bone or joint (27.2%); skin and skin structure (25.1%); bloodstream (20.9%); and lower respiratory tract (12.6%). The clinical success rates in the clinically evaluable and all-treated populations were 83.9% and 62.3%, respectively, whereas the bacteriological eradication rates were 76.9% and 70.2% in the bacteriologically evaluable and all-treated populations, respectively. Linezolid was well tolerated. In 76 (39.8%) of the 191 episodes of infection, patients experienced one or more adverse events or exhibited one or more abnormal laboratory results; in 35 (18.3%) of the 191 cases it was necessary to discontinue treatment. Gastrointestinal tract-related symptoms (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea) were the most common possibly or probably related adverse events and the most common reasons for drug discontinuation.
Conclusions: Linezolid was effective and well tolerated in patients with S. aureus infections who were enrolled in this compassionate use protocol.
Similar articles
-
Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jun 1;34(11):1481-90. doi: 10.1086/340353. Epub 2002 May 13. Clin Infect Dis. 2002. PMID: 12015695 Clinical Trial.
-
Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Japan.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Dec;60(6):1361-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm369. Epub 2007 Oct 3. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007. PMID: 17913720 Clinical Trial.
-
Linezolid versus vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: pooled analysis of randomized studies.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Nov;56(5):923-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki355. Epub 2005 Sep 29. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005. PMID: 16195255
-
Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections.Drugs. 2002;62(3):425-41. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262030-00002. Drugs. 2002. PMID: 11827558 Review.
-
The importance of tissue penetration in achieving successful antimicrobial treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: vancomycin and linezolid.Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Mar;26(3):571-88. doi: 10.1185/03007990903512057. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010. PMID: 20055750 Review.
Cited by
-
Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jun;42(6):2398-402. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2398-2402.2004. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15184410 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Resistant Gram-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infections Using an Oral Linezolid-Based Antibiotic Regime.Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jul 26;12(8):1235. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081235. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37627655 Free PMC article.
-
A Narrative Review of Early Oral Stepdown Therapy for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Yay or Nay?Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 May 5;7(6):ofaa151. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa151. eCollection 2020 Jun. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32523971 Free PMC article. Review.
-
First detection of an invasive Staphylococcus aureus strain (D958) with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in Saudi Arabia.J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jun;48(6):2199-204. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00954-09. Epub 2010 Apr 14. J Clin Microbiol. 2010. PMID: 20392906 Free PMC article.
-
Intramuscular Injection Abscess Due to VRSA: A New Health Care Challenge.Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016 Jun;4(3):277-81. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016. PMID: 27517077 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical