Pharmaceutical research involving the homeless
- PMID: 12461710
- DOI: 10.1076/jmep.27.5.547.10320
Pharmaceutical research involving the homeless
Abstract
Discussions of research involving vulnerable populations have left the homeless comparatively ignored. Participation by these subjects in drug studies has the potential to be upsetting, inconvenient, or unpleasant. Participation occasionally produces injury, health emergencies, and chronic health problems. Nonetheless, no ethical justification exists for the categorical exclusion of homeless persons from research. The appropriate framework for informed consent for these subjects of pharmaceutical research is not a single event of oral or written consent, but a multi-staged arrangement of disclosure, dialogue, and permission-giving. Payments and other rewards in biomedical research raise issues of whether it is ethical to offer inducements to the homeless in exchange for participation in drug studies. Such inducements can influence desperate persons who are seriously lacking in resources. The key is to strike a balance between a rate of payment high enough that it does not exploit subjects by underpayment and low enough that it does not create an irresistible inducement. This proposal does not underestimate the risks of research, which are often overestimated and need to be appraised in light of the relevant empirical literature.
Similar articles
-
Economic vulnerability and payment for research participation.Clin Trials. 2020 Jun;17(3):264-272. doi: 10.1177/1740774520905596. Epub 2020 Feb 17. Clin Trials. 2020. PMID: 32063065 Review.
-
Informed consent: is it always necessary?Injury. 2008 Jun;39(6):651-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.010. Epub 2008 May 27. Injury. 2008. PMID: 18502422 Review.
-
From protectionism to inclusion: A New Zealand perspective on health-related research involving adults incapable of giving informed consent.Bioethics. 2019 Mar;33(3):374-382. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12509. Epub 2018 Sep 18. Bioethics. 2019. PMID: 30226646
-
Ethical issues in neonatal research involving human subjects.Semin Perinatol. 2016 Jun;40(4):247-53. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.12.014. Epub 2016 Jan 21. Semin Perinatol. 2016. PMID: 26804381 Review.
-
The Olivieri Report--a compelling study of the growing tensions in clinical research.Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Jan;9(1):125-32. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0025-x. Sci Eng Ethics. 2003. PMID: 12645235 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Serial Participation and the Ethics of Phase 1 Healthy Volunteer Research.J Med Philos. 2018 Jan 12;43(1):83-114. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhx033. J Med Philos. 2018. PMID: 29342285 Free PMC article.
-
Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill.Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(3):245-64. doi: 10.1007/s11017-006-9000-2. Theor Med Bioeth. 2006. PMID: 16763881
-
Payments to normal healthy volunteers in phase 1 trials: avoiding undue influence while distributing fairly the burdens of research participation.J Med Philos. 2009 Feb;34(1):68-90. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhn036. Epub 2009 Feb 3. J Med Philos. 2009. PMID: 19190076 Free PMC article.
-
Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research.Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(12):2217-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300279. Epub 2011 Oct 20. Am J Public Health. 2011. PMID: 22021285 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of financial payment for research participation among African-American drug users in HIV studies.J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Oct;22(10):1403-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0319-9. Epub 2007 Aug 1. J Gen Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17668270 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical