A comparison of splinted and banded Herbst appliances: treatment changes and complications
- PMID: 12462684
A comparison of splinted and banded Herbst appliances: treatment changes and complications
Abstract
The aims of this study were to compare the frequency of clinical problems, such as fracture and dislodgment, and the dentofacial changes in 28 13-year-old Chinese children with Class II, division 1 nalocclusions treated with either cast-metal splinted Herbst appliances or banded Herbst appliances. ne first fourteen children were treated with a maximum anchorage type of banded Herbst appliance for six months, and the remainder were treated with cast-silver splinted Herbst appliances for seven months. The dentofacial form and the treatment changes were assessed with one aid of pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs. The number of visits and the number of fractured and dislodged appliances were recorded. Both appliances had similar effects on the dentofacial structures. There were no statistically significant dentofacial differences between the groups at the conclusion of treatment. During treatment relatively few banded appliances were dislodged and few splinted appliances fractured. However, a large number of banded appliances fractured, and a similar number of splinted Herbst appliances were dislodged. The latter required less clinical and laboratory time to service and/or replace. It was concluded that splinted Herbst appliances are preferable to banded Herbst appliances because of the savings in clinical and laboratory time.
Similar articles
-
The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):120-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm102. Epub 2008 Jan 23. Eur J Orthod. 2008. PMID: 18216374 Clinical Trial.
-
Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Aug;118(2):142-9. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.104489. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000. PMID: 10935954 Clinical Trial.
-
Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.World J Orthod. 2008 Summer;9(2):121-31. World J Orthod. 2008. PMID: 18575306
-
Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion.Angle Orthod. 2008 Mar;78(2):361-9. doi: 10.2319/031107-123.1. Angle Orthod. 2008. PMID: 18251608 Review.
-
Current Herbst appliance therapy.J Clin Orthod. 1994 May;28(5):296-309. J Clin Orthod. 1994. PMID: 8613509 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Change of mandibular position during two-phase orthodontic treatment of skeletal class II in the Chinese population.ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:804831. doi: 10.1155/2015/804831. Epub 2015 Jan 28. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015. PMID: 25695103 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 13;3(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29534303 Free PMC article.
-
Herbst treatment with mandibular cast splints--revisited.Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):820-7. doi: 10.2319/101010-591.1. Epub 2011 Mar 28. Angle Orthod. 2011. PMID: 21446867 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective study of clinical complications during orthodontic treatment with either a removable mandibular acrylic splint Herbst or with a cantilever Herbst.Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):64-71. doi: 10.2319/122113-936.1. Angle Orthod. 2015. PMID: 24849335 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical complications during treatment with a modified Herbst appliance in combination with a lingual appliance.Head Face Med. 2015 Sep 9;11:31. doi: 10.1186/s13005-015-0088-3. Head Face Med. 2015. PMID: 26353793 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous