Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment
- PMID: 12462873
Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment
Abstract
The aim was to evaluate the median survival time (MST) of direct molar class II restorations (glass ionomer, composite, amalgam) in the Nordic countries and the initial cost, as well as, the theoretical cost per year of function of treatment for patients, Social Insurance Office (SI), and total cost, at Public Dental Services (PDS) in Sweden. Restoration longevity studies conducted in general practice settings in the Nordic countries were used to calculate the MSTs of class II restorations. The initial costs were based on fee schedules from all PDS in Sweden. The MSTs of class II molar restorations in Nordic general practices were shortest for glass ionomer and longest for amalgam. Glass ionomer molar class II restorations had the lowest and composite restorations had the highest initial total cost at PDS in Sweden. The highest theoretical cost per year of function was seen for composite restorations. Amalgam restorations seem to have the longest functional lifetime in Nordic general practices and the lowest theoretical cost per year of function for the patients at PDS in Sweden.
Similar articles
-
Cost of composite and glass ionomer class II molar restorations and theoretical analyses of cost per year of function at public dental services in Sweden.Swed Dent J. 2006;30(3):99-107. Swed Dent J. 2006. PMID: 17233326
-
Long-term cost of direct Class II molar restorations.Swed Dent J. 2002;26(3):107-14. Swed Dent J. 2002. PMID: 12425224
-
Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.J Dent. 2009 Sep;37(9):673-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.010. Epub 2009 May 4. J Dent. 2009. PMID: 19477572
-
Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.Am J Dent. 2005 Jun;18(3):198-211. Am J Dent. 2005. PMID: 16158813 Review.
-
Longevity of posterior restorations.Int Dent J. 1990 Feb;40(1):11-7. Int Dent J. 1990. PMID: 2407659 Review.
Cited by
-
Failure Risk of Composite Resin and Amalgam Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int Dent J. 2025 Aug;75(4):100871. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100871. Epub 2025 Jun 26. Int Dent J. 2025. PMID: 40578032 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A 2-year clinical evaluation of stainless steel crowns and composite resin restorations in primary molars under general anaesthesia in China's Guangdong province.Br Dent J. 2018 Jul 13;225(1):49-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.519. Br Dent J. 2018. PMID: 30002536 No abstract available.
-
Monomer Release from Dental Resins: The Current Status on Study Setup, Detection and Quantification for In Vitro Testing.Polymers (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;14(9):1790. doi: 10.3390/polym14091790. Polymers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35566958 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical, radiographic and biochemical assessment of proximal cavities restored with composite resin using incremental vs. bulk packing techniques: One-year randomized clinical trial.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04746-0. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39350180 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The prevalence of approximal caries in patients after fixed orthodontic treatment and in untreated subjects: a retrospective, cross-sectional study on bitewing radiographs.J Orofac Orthop. 2013 Jan;74(1):64-72. doi: 10.1007/s00056-012-0111-2. Epub 2013 Jan 11. J Orofac Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23307177
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous