Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Dec;137(12):1332-9; discussion 1340.
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.12.1332.

A comparison of percutaneous cryosurgery and percutaneous radiofrequency for unresectable hepatic malignancies

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of percutaneous cryosurgery and percutaneous radiofrequency for unresectable hepatic malignancies

René Adam et al. Arch Surg. 2002 Dec.

Abstract

Hypothesis: The complication and success rates in patients treated with either percutaneous cryosurgery (PCS) or percutaneous radiofrequency (PRF) for unresectable hepatic malignancies are similar.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: University hospital.

Patients and methods: Sixty-four patients were treated with either PCS (n = 31) or PRF (n = 33). Patient treatment was based on the random availability of the probes. Tumors were evaluated by a blinded comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment helical computed tomographic scans. All living patients had at least a 6-month follow-up.

Main outcome measures: Complication rate, initial treatment success (complete devascularization of the tumor), and local recurrence (tumor revascularization within or at its periphery).

Results: The distribution of tumor types was similar in the 2 groups (P =.76). One patient with cirrhosis died of variceal hemorrhage on day 30 after PCS (mortality, 3.2%), while no mortality was observed after PRF (P =.48). Complications occurred in 9 (29%) of the patients following PCS and in 8 (24%) of the patients following PRF (P =.66). Initial treatment success was comparable in the 2 treatment groups (30 [83%] of 36 tumors following PCS vs 34 [83%] of 41 tumors following PRF). However, local recurrences occurred more frequently after PCS than after PRF (16 [53%] of 30 vs 6 [18%] of 34; P =.003). The higher rate of local recurrence was identified for metastases (10 [71%] of 14 after PCS vs 3 [19%] of 16 after PRF; P =.004), while the difference was not significant for hepatocellular carcinoma (6 [38%] of 16 after PCS vs 3 [17%] of 18 after PRF; P =.25). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the use of PCS (P =.003) and more than 1 treatment (P =.05) were independent risk factors for local tumor recurrence.

Conclusion: While similar initial treatment success and complication rates are observed following either PCS or PRF, local recurrences occur more frequently following PCS, particularly for metastases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Percutaneous ablation of liver tumors.
    Boyle MJ. Boyle MJ. Arch Surg. 2003 Jul;138(7):809; author reply 809-10. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.7.809-a. Arch Surg. 2003. PMID: 12860767 No abstract available.

Publication types