Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Dec;120(12):1636-43.
doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.12.1636.

The severity and spatial distribution of visual field defects in primary glaucoma: a comparison of primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma

Gus Gazzard  1 , Paul J Foster, Ananth C Viswanathan, Joe G Devereux, Francis T S Oen, Paul T K Chew, Peng T Khaw, Steve K L Seah
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The severity and spatial distribution of visual field defects in primary glaucoma: a comparison of primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma

Gus Gazzard et al. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the characteristics of visual field defects in primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: Subjects with primary glaucoma aged 30 years and older were prospectively considered for inclusion. Automated static white-on-white perimetry was performed. A minimum of 2 reliable tests was required with a mean deviation (MD) within 2 dB on 2 tests. Subjects with previous symptomatic angle-closure, normal-tension glaucoma, visually significant cataract, or previous intraocular surgery were excluded.

Results: Of 234 subjects assessed, 129 had POAG, and 105 had PACG. The MDs (POAG group, -13.3 dB; PACG group, -18.0 dB) indicated more severe visual loss in subjects with PACG. In subjects with POAG, the superior hemifield was more severely affected than the inferior. This was less pronounced in subjects with PACG. Following stratification by MD, the difference between hemifields was marked in the mild (-10 dB<or=MD) and moderate (-20 dB<or=MD<-10 dB) subgroups but was not present in the severe (MD<-20 dB) subgroup. We detected differences between POAG and PACG in retinal sensitivity between the superior and inferior hemifields, independent of severity of damage.

Conclusions: The pattern of visual field loss was different in the 2 diseases. This may give insight into the pattern of visual loss in predominantly pressure-dependent glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types