Sodium ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients. II. Adverse reactions in iron dextran-sensitive and dextran-tolerant patients
- PMID: 12472786
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00703.x
Sodium ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients. II. Adverse reactions in iron dextran-sensitive and dextran-tolerant patients
Abstract
Background: Iron dextran administration is associated with a high incidence of adverse reactions including anaphylaxis and death. Although dextran, rather than iron, is believed to be the cause of these reactions, it is not known whether iron dextran-sensitive patients can be safely administered another form of parenteral iron, sodium ferric gluconate in sucrose (SFGC).
Methods: In a 69 center, prospective, double-blind, controlled trial of safety and tolerability of SFGC, the rate of reactions to SFGC and placebo in 144 iron dextran-sensitive patients was compared with 2194 patients who were previously tolerant to iron dextran preparations. Serum tryptase levels, a marker of mast cell degranulation, also were measured.
Results: Among 143 iron dextran-sensitive patients exposed to SFGC, three (2.1%) were intolerant. All three had suspected allergic events to SFGC, including one patient with a serious reaction (0.7%). One dextran-sensitive patient (0.7%) had a suspected allergic reaction after placebo. In contrast, among 2194 iron dextran-tolerant patients, reactions to SFGC were significantly less common, with SFGC intolerance seen in seven patients (0.3%; P = 0.020), including five (0.2%) who had suspected allergic events (P = 0.010), but none who had serious events (0.0%; P = 0.061). Two iron dextran-tolerant patients (0.09%) had allergic-like reactions following placebo injections. Two of the three suspected allergic events in the iron dextran-sensitive group were confirmed as mast cell dependent by a 100% increase in serum tryptase, while there were no confirmed allergic events in the iron dextran-tolerant group. Long-term exposure to SFGC in iron dextran-sensitive patients resulted in intolerance in only one additional patient and no serious adverse events.
Conclusions: Patients with a history of iron dextran sensitivity had approximately sevenfold higher rates of reaction to both placebo and SFGC compared to iron dextran tolerant patients. However, logistic regression analysis, performed to account for the higher reaction rate to placebo, suggests that this increased reactivity was not drug-specific nor immunologically mediated, but represented host idiosyncrasy. These results support the conclusions that reactions to SFGC can be attributed to pseudoallergy, and that SFGC is not a true allergen.
Similar articles
-
Sodium ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients: adverse reactions compared to placebo and iron dextran.Kidney Int. 2002 May;61(5):1830-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00314.x. Kidney Int. 2002. PMID: 11967034 Clinical Trial.
-
The comparative safety of various intravenous iron preparations in chronic kidney disease patients.Ren Fail. 2008;30(6):629-38. doi: 10.1080/08860220802134631. Ren Fail. 2008. PMID: 18661414 Clinical Trial.
-
Chronic use of sodium ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients: safety of higher-dose (> or =250 mg) administration.Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Mar;41(3):651-7. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2003.50141. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003. PMID: 12612989 Clinical Trial.
-
Sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose: safer intravenous iron therapy than iron dextrans.Am J Kidney Dis. 1999 Mar;33(3):464-70. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70183-6. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999. PMID: 10070910 Review.
-
Parenteral iron use in the management of anemia in end-stage renal disease patients.Am J Kidney Dis. 2000 Jan;35(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(00)70294-0. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000. PMID: 10620537 Review.
Cited by
-
Proteinuria induced by parenteral iron in chronic kidney disease--a comparative randomized controlled trial.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jan;6(1):114-21. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06020710. Epub 2010 Sep 28. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011. PMID: 20876669 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Chinese expert consensus on the application of intravenous iron (2019)].Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2019 May 14;40(5):358-362. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.05.002. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31207697 Free PMC article. Chinese. No abstract available.
-
Safety of intravenous iron formulations: facts and folklore.Blood Transfus. 2014 Jul;12(3):296-300. doi: 10.2450/2014.0094-14. Blood Transfus. 2014. PMID: 25074787 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Iron therapy for renal anemia: how much needed, how much harmful?Pediatr Nephrol. 2007 Apr;22(4):480-9. doi: 10.1007/s00467-006-0405-y. Epub 2007 Jan 6. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007. PMID: 17206511 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safety issues with intravenous iron products in the management of anemia in chronic kidney disease.Clin Med Res. 2008 Dec;6(3-4):93-102. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2008.811. Clin Med Res. 2008. PMID: 19325171 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical