Initial therapy for mild to moderate Crohn's disease: mesalamine or budesonide?

Abstract

The initial choice of therapy for mild to moderately active Crohn's disease is controversial. Both the National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study (NCCDS) and the European Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study (ECCDS) demonstrated that sulfasalazine is effective for the induction of remission. Subsequent studies of new mesalamine formulations showed inconsistent results; two trials, however, demonstrated a statistically significant improvement with Pentasa and Asacol treatment, and meta-analyses suggest a modest benefit of mesalamine maintenance therapy. The NCCDS and ECCDS trials found that corticosteroid therapy is much more effective than sulfasalazine for induction of remission, but corticosteroids did not show maintenance benefits. Corticosteroid use is frequently associated with adverse effects, and the majority of patients treated with prednisone become either steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent; many of these patients ultimately need treatment with immunosuppressives and/or surgery. Budesonide, a topical corticosteroid with high first-pass hepatic metabolism, is slightly less effective in inducing remission than conventional corticosteroids but is significantly less likely to cause side effects. Budesonide 9 mg/day was shown to be more effective than mesalamine (Pentasa 4 g/day) for induction therapy, but budesonide has been ineffective as a maintenance therapy. Mesalamine may be useful for patients with more extensive disease, those intolerant of sulfasalazine, or those with contraindications or intolerance to budesonide. Alternatively, sulfasalazine is effective in the presence of colonic disease. Clinicians must decide on the basis of the existing evidence whether budesonide or mesalamine is the preferred initial therapy for active Crohn's disease.