Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jan;62(1):20-6.
doi: 10.1136/ard.62.1.20.

Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis

L C Doward  1 , A Spoorenberg, S A Cook, D Whalley, P S Helliwell, L J Kay, S P McKenna, A Tennant, D van der Heijde, M A Chamberlain
Affiliations

Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis

L C Doward et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Although disease-specific health status measures are available for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), no instrument exists for assessing quality of life (QoL) in the condition.

Objective: To produce an AS-specific QoL measure that would be relevant and acceptable to respondents, valid, and reliable.

Methods: The ASQoL employs the needs-based model of QoL and was developed in parallel in the UK and the Netherlands (NL). Content was derived from interviews with patients in each country. Face and content validity were assessed through patient field test interviews (UK and NL). A postal survey in the UK produced a more efficient version of the ASQoL, which was tested for scaling properties, reliability, internal consistency, and validity in a further postal survey in each country.

Results: A 41 item questionnaire was derived from interview transcripts. Field testing interviews confirmed acceptability. Rasch analysis of data from the first survey (n=121) produced a 26 item questionnaire. Rasch analysis of data from the second survey (UK: n=164; NL: n=154) showed some item misfit, but showed that items formed a hierarchical order and were stable over time. Problematic items were removed giving an 18 item scale. Both language versions had excellent internal consistency (alpha=0.89-0.91), test-retest reliability (r(s)=0.92 UK and r(s)=0.91 NL), and validity.

Conclusions: The ASQoL provides a valuable tool for assessing the impact of interventions for AS and for evaluating models of service delivery. It is well accepted by patients, taking about four minutes to complete, and has excellent scaling and psychometric properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stages in production of the ASQoL
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. J Rheumatol. 1990 Jul;17(7):946-50 - PubMed
    1. Health Policy. 1992 Oct;22(3):307-19 - PubMed
    1. Health Policy. 1992 Oct;22(3):321-30 - PubMed
    1. Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Sep;33(9):842-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Nov;33(11):1060-6 - PubMed

Publication types