This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2002 Dec;11(6):543.

doi: 10.1097/00061198-200212000-00017.

Central corneal thickness on GAT (Goldman applanation tonometry accuracy)

Richard Stodtmeister

PMID: 12483103
DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200212000-00017

Comment

Central corneal thickness on GAT (Goldman applanation tonometry accuracy)

Richard Stodtmeister. J Glaucoma. 2002 Dec.

. 2002 Dec;11(6):543.

doi: 10.1097/00061198-200212000-00017.

Author

Richard Stodtmeister

PMID: 12483103
DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200212000-00017

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Singh RP, Goldberg I, Graham SL, Sharma A, Mohsin M. Singh RP, et al. J Glaucoma. 2001 Jun;10(3):206-10. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200106000-00011. J Glaucoma. 2001. PMID: 11442184

Similar articles

Re: Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Stodtmeister R. Stodtmeister R. J Glaucoma. 2002 Aug;11(4):371-2; author reply 372. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200208000-00016. J Glaucoma. 2002. PMID: 12169977 No abstract available.
Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Singh RP, Goldberg I, Graham SL, Sharma A, Mohsin M. Singh RP, et al. J Glaucoma. 2001 Jun;10(3):206-10. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200106000-00011. J Glaucoma. 2001. PMID: 11442184
Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma.
Regev G, Harris A, Siesky B, Shoshani Y, Egan P, Moss A, Zalish M, WuDunn D, Ehrlich R. Regev G, et al. J Glaucoma. 2011 Jun-Jul;20(5):282-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e66498. J Glaucoma. 2011. PMID: 20577097 Clinical Trial.
Tonometry and corneal thickness.
Brubaker RF. Brubaker RF. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan;117(1):104-5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.117.1.104. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999. PMID: 9930168 Review. No abstract available.
Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and glaucoma risk--a guide for the perplexed.
Brandt JD. Brandt JD. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug;42(4):562-6. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17641698 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Limbal rebound tonometry: clinical comparisons and applications.
Bontzos G, Agiorgiotakis M, Kapsala Z, Detorakis E. Bontzos G, et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep;255(9):1795-1799. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3725-7. Epub 2017 Jun 28. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28660442
The effect of caffeine on intraocular pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li M, Wang M, Guo W, Wang J, Sun X. Li M, et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;249(3):435-42. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1455-1. Epub 2010 Aug 13. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID: 20706731
[Transpalpebral tonometry with a digital tonometer in healthy eyes and after penetrating keratoplasty].
Amm M, Hedderich J. Amm M, et al. Ophthalmologe. 2005 Jan;102(1):70-6. doi: 10.1007/s00347-004-1082-5. Ophthalmologe. 2005. PMID: 15322801 German.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
- Wolters Kluwer