A dozen years of drug treatment courts: uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm
- PMID: 12487231
- DOI: 10.1081/ja-120014419
A dozen years of drug treatment courts: uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm
Abstract
The creation of the first drug treatment courts were in response to the revolving door of drug use and recidivism. There was no theoretical basis for these courts and no universal support for them. Twelve years have brought incredible changes. Therapeutic jurisprudence says, in essence, whether intended or not, that legal rules and procedures have therapeutic effects. Drug treatment courts have adopted principles of TJ to enhance their functioning. The Conference of Chief Justices recently issued a resolution supporting "problem-solving" courts. New trial court standards legitimize drug courts' procedures. Drug treatment courts are now mainstream and can no longer be seen as "boutique" courts staffed by renegade judges. Working therapeutically is an appropriate, effective, and productive way for the justice system to function.
Similar articles
-
Drug treatment courts and the disease paradigm.Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1723-50. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014428. Subst Use Misuse. 2002. PMID: 12487240 Review.
-
The emergence of drug treatment courts in Australia.Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1567-94. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014422. Subst Use Misuse. 2002. PMID: 12487234 Review.
-
A decade of drug treatment court research.Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1489-527. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014420. Subst Use Misuse. 2002. PMID: 12487232 Review.
-
Juvenile drug treatment courts in the United States: initial lessons learned and issues being addressed.Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1689-722. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014427. Subst Use Misuse. 2002. PMID: 12487239 Review.
-
Drug treatment courts, British style: the drug treatment court movement in Britain.Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1595-614. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014423. Subst Use Misuse. 2002. PMID: 12487235 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching.Crime Delinq. 2014 Sep;60(6):909-938. doi: 10.1177/0011128710382342. Crime Delinq. 2014. PMID: 25342859 Free PMC article.
-
Promising practices for delivery of court-supervised substance abuse treatment: perspectives from six high-performing California counties operating Proposition 36.Eval Program Plann. 2011 May;34(2):124-34. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.09.001. Epub 2010 Sep 29. Eval Program Plann. 2011. PMID: 20965568 Free PMC article.
-
Criminally Involved Parents Who Misuse Substances and Children's Odds of Being Arrested as a Young Adult: Do Drug Treatment Courts Mitigate the Risk?J Child Fam Stud. 2016 Aug;25(8):2447-2457. doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0406-9. Epub 2016 Apr 11. J Child Fam Stud. 2016. PMID: 27840567 Free PMC article.
-
Intergenerational effects of parental substance-related convictions and adult drug treatment court participation on children's school performance.Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Sep;85(5):452-68. doi: 10.1037/ort0000087. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015. PMID: 26460705 Free PMC article.
-
The Effects of the Addiction Programme of Probation on Treatment Motivation, Abstinence and Quality of Life: a Comparative Study with Motivational Interviewing and Individual Intervention.Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2018 Jun 4;55(3):261-270. doi: 10.5152/npa.2017.19440. eCollection 2018 Sep. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2018. PMID: 30224874 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical