Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults
- PMID: 12488083
- DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(02)00084-6
Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults
Abstract
This paper examines the physiological mechanisms responsible for differences in the amplitude of force fluctuations between young and old adults. Because muscle force is a consequence of motor unit activity, the potential mechanisms include both motor unit properties and the behavior of motor unit populations. The force fluctuations, however, depend not only on the age of the individual but also on the muscle group performing the task, the type and intensity of the muscle contraction, and the physical activity status of the individual. Computer simulations and experimental findings performed on tasks that involved single agonist and antagonist muscles suggest that differences in force fluctuations are not attributable to motor unit twitch force, motor unit number, or nonuniform activation of the agonist muscle, but that they are influenced by the variability and common modulation of motor unit discharge in both the agonist and antagonist muscles. Because the amplitude of the force fluctuations does not vary linearly with muscle activation, these results suggest that multiple mechanisms contribute to the differences in force fluctuations between young and old adults, although the boundary conditions for each mechanism remain to be determined.
Similar articles
-
Motor unit control properties in constant-force isometric contractions.J Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;76(3):1503-16. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.3.1503. J Neurophysiol. 1996. PMID: 8890270 Clinical Trial.
-
Variability of motor unit discharge and force fluctuations across a range of muscle forces in older adults.Muscle Nerve. 2005 Oct;32(4):533-40. doi: 10.1002/mus.20392. Muscle Nerve. 2005. PMID: 15986419
-
Motor-unit synchronization is not responsible for larger motor-unit forces in old adults.J Neurophysiol. 2000 Jul;84(1):358-66. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.358. J Neurophysiol. 2000. PMID: 10899210
-
Aging and skeletal muscle force control: Current perspectives and future directions.Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2022 Oct;32(10):1430-1443. doi: 10.1111/sms.14207. Epub 2022 Jul 28. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2022. PMID: 35815914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Resistance training: cortical, spinal, and motor unit adaptations.Can J Appl Physiol. 2005 Jun;30(3):328-40. doi: 10.1139/h05-125. Can J Appl Physiol. 2005. PMID: 16129897 Review.
Cited by
-
Timing variability and not force variability predicts the endpoint accuracy of fast and slow isometric contractions.Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;202(1):189-202. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2126-5. Epub 2009 Dec 24. Exp Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20033680 Free PMC article.
-
The scaling of motor noise with muscle strength and motor unit number in humans.Exp Brain Res. 2004 Aug;157(4):417-30. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1856-7. Epub 2004 Mar 11. Exp Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15014922
-
The effects of forearm position and contraction intensity on cortical and spinal excitability during a submaximal force steadiness task of the elbow flexors.J Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb 1;123(2):522-528. doi: 10.1152/jn.00349.2019. Epub 2019 Nov 27. J Neurophysiol. 2020. PMID: 31774348 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of tendon vibration and age on force reproduction task performed with wrist flexors.Exp Brain Res. 2022 Mar;240(3):941-951. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06311-z. Epub 2022 Jan 28. Exp Brain Res. 2022. PMID: 35089392
-
Practice improves motor control in older adults by increasing the motor unit modulation from 13 to 30 Hz.J Neurophysiol. 2013 Nov;110(10):2393-401. doi: 10.1152/jn.00345.2013. Epub 2013 Aug 28. J Neurophysiol. 2013. PMID: 23986564 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical