Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces
- PMID: 12488102
- DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01223-8
Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces
Abstract
Non-covalent residue side-chain interactions occur in many different types of proteins and facilitate many biological functions. Are these differences manifested in the sequence compositions and/or the residue-residue contact preferences of the interfaces? Previous studies analysed small data sets and gave contradictory answers. Here, we introduced a new data-mining method that yielded the largest high-resolution data set of interactions analysed. We introduced an information theory-based analysis method. On the basis of sequence features, we were able to differentiate six types of protein interfaces, each corresponding to a different functional or structural association between residues. Particularly, we found significant differences in amino acid composition and residue-residue preferences between interactions of residues within the same structural domain and between different domains, between permanent and transient interfaces, and between interactions associating homo-oligomers and hetero-oligomers. The differences between the six types were so substantial that, using amino acid composition alone, we could predict statistically to which of the six types of interfaces a pool of 1000 residues belongs at 63-100% accuracy. All interfaces differed significantly from the background of all residues in SWISS-PROT, from the group of surface residues, and from internal residues that were not involved in non-trivial interactions. Overall, our results suggest that the interface type could be predicted from sequence and that interface-type specific mean-field potentials may be adequate for certain applications.
Similar articles
-
Oligomerisation status and evolutionary conservation of interfaces of protein structural domain superfamilies.Mol Biosyst. 2013 Jul;9(7):1652-61. doi: 10.1039/c3mb25484d. Epub 2013 Mar 27. Mol Biosyst. 2013. PMID: 23532342
-
Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces.Proteins. 2001 May 1;43(2):89-102. Proteins. 2001. PMID: 11276079
-
A comparative analysis of protein interfaces.Protein Pept Lett. 2010 Nov;17(11):1450-8. doi: 10.2174/0929866511009011450. Protein Pept Lett. 2010. PMID: 20666728
-
Are knowledge-based potentials derived from protein structure sets discriminative with respect to amino acid types?Proteins. 1998 May 15;31(3):225-46. Proteins. 1998. PMID: 9593195 Review.
-
Close-range electrostatic interactions in proteins.Chembiochem. 2002 Jul 2;3(7):604-17. doi: 10.1002/1439-7633(20020703)3:7<604::AID-CBIC604>3.0.CO;2-X. Chembiochem. 2002. PMID: 12324994 Review.
Cited by
-
Structural Perspectives on the Evolutionary Expansion of Unique Protein-Protein Binding Sites.Biophys J. 2015 Sep 15;109(6):1295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.06.056. Epub 2015 Jul 23. Biophys J. 2015. PMID: 26213149 Free PMC article.
-
Mutation Edgotype Drives Fitness Effect in Human.Front Bioinform. 2021 Aug 30;1:690769. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2021.690769. eCollection 2021. Front Bioinform. 2021. PMID: 36303776 Free PMC article.
-
Accurate and efficient loop selections by the DFIRE-based all-atom statistical potential.Protein Sci. 2004 Feb;13(2):391-9. doi: 10.1110/ps.03411904. Protein Sci. 2004. PMID: 14739324 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using an ensemble method.BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 16;10:426. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-426. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009. PMID: 20015386 Free PMC article.
-
Protein-protein interactions more conserved within species than across species.PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Jul 21;2(7):e79. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020079. Epub 2006 May 18. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006. PMID: 16854211 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources