Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001
- PMID: 12488482
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.24.1883
Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001
Abstract
The prescribed dose of anticancer agents is most commonly calculated using body surface area as the only independent variable, and it has been shown that this approach still results in large interpatient variability in drug exposure. Here, we retrospectively assessed the pharmacokinetics of 33 investigational agents tested in phase I trials from 1991 through 2001, as a function of body surface area in 1650 adult cancer patients. Twelve of the drugs were administered orally, 19 were administered intravenously, and two were administered by both routes. Body surface area-based dosing was statistically significantly associated with a reduction in interpatient variability in drug clearance for only five of the 33 agents: docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil/eniluracil, paclitaxel, temozolomide, and troxacitabine. These results do not support the use of body surface area in dose calculations and suggest that alternate dosing strategies should be evaluated. We conclude that body surface area should not be used to determine starting doses of investigational agents in future phase I studies.
Comment in
-
Body surface area in dosing anticancer agents: scratch the surface!J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Dec 18;94(24):1822-3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.24.1822. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002. PMID: 12488468 No abstract available.
-
Re: Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Nov 5;95(21):1638-40. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg095. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003. PMID: 14600098 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
