[Clinical postoperative surveillance of breast carcinoma]

Abstract

The problem of post-surgical clinical follow-up for breast cancer patients is still open. A lot of comparative studies between intensive and minimal follow-up showed no advantage of the former vs. the latter modality. The above data have been confirmed also from sistematic revisions and from pharmaco-economic studies. The ASCO guidelines confirm the importance of clinical surveillance, together with annual mammography and pelvic examination, while no blood tests or other instrumental examinations are indicated in absence of specific symptoms. The follow-up program needs to be realized under the supervision of a specialist with specific experience in the oncologic evaluation. Concerning the patients with high risk of recurrence, there is no agreement, even if no advantage seems to exist with an intensive follow-up program in terms of quality or quantity of life. The Authors suggest that the standard follow-up program should include a thoracic X-ray picture and an abdominal USG, in order to detect early a small number (< or = 2 sites) of visceral metastases, amenable of a treatment. The above program should be realized from a multidisciplinary team (surgeon, medical oncologist, radiotherapist) gaining in terms of quality and sparing time and resources.