The incidence and risk factors for venous obstruction after implantation of transvenous pacing leads
- PMID: 12494619
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01605.x
The incidence and risk factors for venous obstruction after implantation of transvenous pacing leads
Abstract
Several investigators have shown that the incidence of venous obstruction after pacemaker implantation was observed in 31-50% of pacemaker patients. However, these previous reports did not investigate the venous system prior to implantation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors for venous obstruction in patients with transvenous pacing leads. The study included 131 consecutive patients (64 men, 67 women; mean age 71.3 +/- 9.8 years) who were investigated using intravenous digital subtraction angiography (DSA) before and after permanent pacemaker implantation. Follow-up DSA was performed for a mean interval of 44 +/- 6 months after pacemaker lead implantation in 79 of 131 patients. A diameter narrowing > 60% was defined as an obstruction. Prior to implantation of pacing leads, venous obstruction was present in 18 (13.7%) of 131 patients. In 15 of these 18 patients, the obstruction was present at the site of the left innominate vein. Follow-up DSA, after implantation of pacing leads, showed that venous obstruction was observed in 26 (32.9%) of 79 patients. There were no significant differences between obstruction and nonobstruction groups in terms of age, sex, cardiothoracic ratio, left atrial dimension, left ventricular ejection fraction, baseline heart diseases for indication of pacemaker implantation, or number and body size of pacing leads. Neither clinical symptoms nor abnormal physical findings were observed in any patients. In conclusion, the incidence of venous obstruction after pacing lead implantation is less than that of previous reports, which might be related to the incidence of venous obstruction before pacing leads implantation.
Similar articles
-
Venous thrombosis and stenosis after implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005 Jun;13(1):9-19. doi: 10.1007/s10840-005-1140-1. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15976973 Review.
-
Association between selected risk factors and the incidence of venous obstruction after pacemaker implantation: demographic and clinical factors.Kardiol Pol. 2011;69(10):1033-40. Kardiol Pol. 2011. PMID: 22006604
-
Incidence and risk factors of upper extremity deep vein lesions after permanent transvenous pacemaker implant: a 6-month follow-up prospective study.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Sep;25(9):1301-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01301.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002. PMID: 12380764
-
Predictors of venous obstruction following pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a contrast venographic study on 100 patients admitted for generator change, lead revision, or device upgrade.Europace. 2007 May;9(5):328-32. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum019. Epub 2007 Mar 16. Europace. 2007. PMID: 17369270
-
Venous complications after insertion of a transvenous pacemaker.Mayo Clin Proc. 1992 Mar;67(3):258-65. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60103-7. Mayo Clin Proc. 1992. PMID: 1545594 Review.
Cited by
-
His-bundle Pacing as a Bailout Therapy for a Patient with Subclavian Stenosis and No Suitable Coronary Sinus Branch: A Double Whammy.J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2022 Sep 15;13(9):5159-5163. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2022.130902. eCollection 2022 Sep. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2022. PMID: 36196239 Free PMC article.
-
New Insights in Central Venous Disorders. The Role of Transvenous Lead Extractions.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 23;9:783576. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.783576. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35282352 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Upgrading to biventricular pacing: indications and procedural challenges].Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2008 Dec;19 Suppl 1:38-43. doi: 10.1007/s00399-008-0607-z. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2008. PMID: 19169733 Review. German.
-
Be aware of wires in the veins: a case of superior vena cava syndrome in a patient with permanent pacemaker.J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2012 Oct 15;2(3). doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v2i3.19159. Print 2012. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2012. PMID: 23882380 Free PMC article.
-
Venous thrombosis and stenosis after implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005 Jun;13(1):9-19. doi: 10.1007/s10840-005-1140-1. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15976973 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical