Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT
- PMID: 12499059
- DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(02)00302-9
Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT
Abstract
Screening for lung cancer is hoped to reduce mortality from this common tumour, which is characterised by a dismal overall survival, relatively well defined risk groups (mainly heavy cigarette smokers and workers exposed to asbestos) and a lack of early symptoms. In the past studies using sputum cytology and chest radiography have failed to demonstrate any reduction in lung cancer mortality through screening. One of the reasons is probably the relatively poor sensitivity of both these tests in early tumours. Low radiation dose computed tomography (CT) has been shown to have a much higher sensitivity for small pulmonary nodules, which are believed to be the most common presentation of early lung cancer. As, however, small pulmonary nodules are common and most are not malignant, non-invasive diagnostic algorithms are required to correctly classify the detected lesions and avoid invasive procedures in benign nodules. Nodule density, size and the demonstration of growth at follow-up have been shown to be useful in this respect and may in the future be supplemented by contrast-enhanced CT and positron emission tomography. Based on these diagnostic algorithms preliminary studies of low-dose CT in heavy smokers have demonstrated a high proportion of asymptomatic, early, resectable cancers with good survival. As, however, several biases could explain these findings in the absence of the ultimate goal of cancer screening, i.e. mortality reduction, most researchers believe that randomised controlled trials including several 10000 subjects are required to demonstrate a possible mortality reduction. Only then general recommendations to screen individuals at risk of lung cancer with low-dose CT should be made. It can be hoped that international cooperation will succeed in providing results as early as possible.
Similar articles
-
Low-dose CT: new tool for screening lung cancer?Eur Radiol. 2001;11(10):1916-24. doi: 10.1007/s003300100952. Eur Radiol. 2001. PMID: 11702123 Review.
-
Impact of low-dose CT on lung cancer screening.Lung Cancer. 2004 Aug;45 Suppl 2:S13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.07.997. Lung Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15552777 Review.
-
[Early lung cancer detection with low-dose CT: an update].Radiologe. 2002 Aug;42(8):608-11. doi: 10.1007/s00117-002-0772-8. Radiologe. 2002. PMID: 12426738 German.
-
[Bronchial carcinoma screening with low dosage CT. Current status].Radiologe. 2001 Mar;41(3):256-60. doi: 10.1007/s001170050985. Radiologe. 2001. PMID: 11322071 German.
-
[Diagnostic work-up of pulmonary nodules : Management of pulmonary nodules detected with low‑dose CT screening].Radiologe. 2016 Sep;56(9):803-9. doi: 10.1007/s00117-016-0150-6. Radiologe. 2016. PMID: 27495787 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Cancer screening in renal transplant recipients: what is the evidence?Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Mar;3 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S87-S100. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03320807. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008. PMID: 18309007 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Opinion of the Austrian Society of Radiology and the Austrian Society of Pneumology].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013 Jun;125(11-12):339-45. doi: 10.1007/s00508-013-0356-9. Epub 2013 May 15. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013. PMID: 23674050 German.
-
CT screening: a trade-off of risks, benefits, and costs.J Clin Invest. 2003 Jun;111(11):1612-9. doi: 10.1172/JCI18842. J Clin Invest. 2003. PMID: 12782661 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Automatic lung segmentation in CT images with accurate handling of the hilar region.J Digit Imaging. 2011 Feb;24(1):11-27. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9229-1. Epub 2009 Oct 14. J Digit Imaging. 2011. PMID: 19826872 Free PMC article.
-
Interobserver Variability in Manual Versus Semi-Automatic CT Assessments of Small Lung Nodule Diameter and Volume.Tomography. 2024 Dec 19;10(12):2087-2099. doi: 10.3390/tomography10120148. Tomography. 2024. PMID: 39728910 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous