Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jan;56(1):69-73.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.56.1.69.

APC mutation and tumour budding in colorectal cancer

Affiliations

APC mutation and tumour budding in colorectal cancer

J R Jass et al. J Clin Pathol. 2003 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: To determine the frequency of tumour budding and somatic APC mutation in a series of colorectal cancers stratified according to DNA microsatellite instability (MSI) status.

Material/methods: Ninety five colorectal cancers were genotyped for APC mutation in the mutation cluster region (exon 15) and scored for the presence of tumour budding at the invasive margin in haematoxylin and eosin stained sections. A subset was immunostained for beta catenin and p16.

Results: The frequency of both somatic APC mutation and tumour budding increased pari passu in cancers stratified as sporadic MSI high (MSI-H), hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), MSI low (MSI-L), and microsatellite stable (MSS). Both budding and APC mutation were significantly less frequent in sporadic MSI-H cancers than in MSI-L or MSS cancers. Tumour buds were characterised by increased immunostaining for both beta catenin and p16.

Conclusion: Tumour budding is associated with an adverse prognosis. The lack of budding in MSI-H colorectal cancer may account for the improved prognosis of this subset and may be explained by an intact WNT signalling pathway and/or inactivated p16(INK4a).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tumour budding demonstrated by small cell clusters at the invasive margin of a colorectal cancer (haematoxylin and eosin; original magnification, ×40).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Extensive cytoplasmic and nuclear immunostaining for β catenin in tumour buds (avidin–biotin complex technique).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Tumour buds showing cytoplasmic expression of p16 (avidin–biotin complex technique).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Dysregulated p16 binds cyclin dependent kinase 4 (cdk4), which results in cytoplasmic sequestration of cdk4. Binding between nuclear cyclin D1 and cdk2 results in an inert complex but serves to compete with the binding of cdk2 to cyclins A and E. This may explain why there is increased expression of nuclear cyclin D1 in tumour buds whereas proliferation is decreased.

References

    1. Jass JR, Atkin WS, Cuzick J, et al. The grading of rectal cancer: historical perspectives and a multivariate analysis of 447 cases. Histopathology 1986;10:437–59. - PubMed
    1. Jass JR, Love SB, Northover JMA. A new prognostic classification of rectal cancer. Lancet 1987;i:1303–6. - PubMed
    1. Morodomi T, Isomoto H, Shirouzu K, et al. An index for estimating the probability of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancers. Lymph node metastasis and the histopathology of actively invasive regions of cancer. Cancer 1989;63:539–43. - PubMed
    1. Hase K, Shatney C, Johnson D, et al. Prognostic value of tumor “budding” in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:627–35. - PubMed
    1. Ueno H, Murphy J, Jass JR, et al. Tumour “budding” as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer. Histopathology 2002;40:127–32. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms