Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jan;60(1):16-26.
doi: 10.1136/oem.60.1.16.

Dose-response patterns for vibration-induced white finger

Affiliations

Dose-response patterns for vibration-induced white finger

M J Griffin et al. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jan.

Abstract

Aims: To investigate alternative relations between cumulative exposures to hand-transmitted vibration (taking account of vibration magnitude, lifetime exposure duration, and frequency of vibration) and the development of white finger (Raynaud's phenomenon).

Methods: Three previous studies have been combined to provide a group of 1557 users of powered vibratory tools in seven occupational subgroups: stone grinders, stone carvers, quarry drillers, dockyard caulkers, dockyard boilermakers, dockyard painters, and forest workers. The estimated total operating duration in hours was thus obtained for each subject, for each tool, and for all tools combined. From the vibration magnitudes and exposure durations, seven alternative measurements of cumulative exposure were calculated for each subject, using expressions of the form: dose = summation operator a(m)(i)t(i), where a(i) is the acceleration magnitude on tool i, t(i) is the lifetime exposure duration for tool i, and m = 0, 1, 2, or 4.

Results: For all seven alternative dose measures, an increase in dose was associated with a significant increase in the occurrence of vibration-induced white finger, after adjustment for age and smoking. However, dose measures with high powers of acceleration (m > 1) faired less well than measures in which the weighted or unweighted acceleration, and lifetime exposure duration, were given equal weight (m = 1). Dose determined solely by the lifetime exposure duration (without consideration of the vibration magnitude) gave better predictions than measures with m greater than unity. All measures of dose calculated from the unweighted acceleration gave better predictions than the equivalent dose measures using acceleration frequency-weighted according to current standards.

Conclusions: Since the total duration of exposure does not discriminate between exposures accumulated over the day and those accumulated over years, a linear relation between vibration magnitude and exposure duration seems appropriate for predicting the occurrence of vibration-induced white finger. Poorer predictions were obtained when the currently recommended frequency weighting was employed than when accelerations at all frequencies were given equal weight. Findings suggest that improvements are possible to both the frequency weighting and the time dependency used to predict the development of vibration-induced white finger in current standards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1986 Aug;12(4 Spec No):284-8 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1986 Aug;12(4 Spec No):338-42 - PubMed
    1. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1988;61(1-2):25-34 - PubMed
    1. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1989;61(7):473-81 - PubMed
    1. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1990 Apr;51(4):179-84 - PubMed