Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002;19(6):502-6.
doi: 10.1159/000067605.

Specimen retrieval in laparoscopic colon surgery

Affiliations
Review

Specimen retrieval in laparoscopic colon surgery

T Hackert et al. Dig Surg. 2002.

Abstract

In the past decade, for benign as well as malignant colon diseases, minimally invasive surgery has gained more and more importance in colon surgery. Specimen retrieval after colonic resections is difficult due to the large size of the specimen usually resected. To date there is no standardized retrieval technique for the different procedures. Four incision sites are common for transabdominal specimen retrieval: left or right lower quadrant transrectal portside incision; periumbilical midline incision, and transverse suprapubic incision. Perineal incisions are used for retrieval following low anterior resection or abdomino-perineal extirpation. Three major complications are described in the literature: wound infection (0-9%); hernias (0-2%), and incision site recurrence (0-1.3%). There are no significant differences between the different incision sites with regard to the occurrence of complications. In laparoscopic surgery for malignant diseases retrieval is usually performed using a plastic bag, whereas retrieval can be performed hand-assisted without a bag during surgery for benign diseases. Wound edge protectors are recommended by several authors, yet there is no standard system which is accepted broadly. In conclusion, specimen retrieval in laparoscopic colon surgery is not standardized. The morbidity rate for specific retrieval complications ranges between 0 and 9%, yet there are no randomized controlled studies or evidence-based data regarding different retrieval approaches and systems.

PubMed Disclaimer