Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Oct-Dec;6(4):345-7.

Laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer

Affiliations

Laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer

Johnson C C Chen et al. JSLS. 2002 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Low anterior resection with hand-sutured coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer is technically feasible, and it does not compromise oncologic results. We describe herein the effectiveness of the operation in treating low rectal cancer by a laparoscopic approach followed by intraanal canal dissection.

Methods: From February 1999 to October 1999, we used a laparoscopic procedure to divide the inferior mesenteric vessels and to dissect downward into the pelvic cavity as low as possible. A purse-string suture 1-cm distal to the lower margin of the tumor was secured and transection of the rectum was performed circumferentially via the anal canal near the dentate line. The specimen was removed by the pull-through method and coloanal anastomosis was completed with hand suture. A protective loop ileostomy was fashioned.

Results: We operated on 8 patients (4 males) with low tumor localization (average 4-cm above the dentate line). The age ranged from 45 to 83 years, with a median age of 64. The average operation time was 210 minutes (150 to 360 minutes), and the average blood loss was 250 cc (minimal to 750 cc). No operative mortalities occurred, but 2 patients had minor anastomotic slough complications. The average hospital stay was 13 days (7 to 26 days). The postoperative pathologic stage was T2N0M0 in 4 patients, T3N0M0 in 2 patients, T2N1M0 in 1 patient, and T3N2M0 in 1 patient. No local recurrence or distant metastasis occurred during the median 14 months (12 to 20 months) of follow-up.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis combined with intraanal canal dissection is safe and technically feasible. The oncologic results seem not to be compromised, but need further evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Black WA, Waugh JM. The intramural extension of carcinoma of the descending colon, sigmoid and rectosigmoid. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1948;84:457–464 - PubMed
    1. William NS, Dixon MF, Johnston D. Reappraisal of the 5-cm rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patient's survival. Br J Surg. 1983;70:150–154 - PubMed
    1. Victor W, Fazio MB. Cancer of the rectum-sphincter-saving operation. Stapling techniques. Surg Cl North Am. 1988;68:1367–1382 - PubMed
    1. Parks AG, Perey JP. Resection and sutured coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1982;69:301–304 - PubMed
    1. Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Lauwers GY. Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 1994;219:365–373 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources