Bone marrow biopsy: interpretive guidelines for the surgical pathologist

Abstract

Ideally, the bone marrow core biopsy should be reviewed with knowledge of the clinical history, complete blood count, and findings in the peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate smears. However, for a variety of reasons, the pathologist may receive the core biopsy and aspirate clot section without all of this information. Although this approach is not optimal, a great deal of valuable information can be generated from these specimens. Over the past 20 years, there has been considerable progress in the fields of flow cytometric analysis, immunohistochemistry, and molecular diagnostic studies that can be performed on smears or extracted DNA from paraffin embedded tissue. These modalities have augmented and refined diagnostic criteria formerly ascertained by light microscopy, cytochemistry, and cytogenetics. This is particularly true of some myeloid and lymphoreticular neoplasms where a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis has become necessary. Despite this growing complexity and dependence on newer methodologies, the traditional role of histopathology in evaluating the bone marrow biopsy remains as important as it has been in the past. In this review, we focus on contemporary practices and expectations for interpreting bone marrow biopsies and clot sections.