Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Dec;20(6):1419-22.
doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00294402.

Size matching in lung transplantation using predicted total lung capacity

Affiliations
Free article

Size matching in lung transplantation using predicted total lung capacity

J P Ouwens et al. Eur Respir J. 2002 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Height is used in allocation of donor lungs as an indirect estimate of thoracic size. Total lung capacity (TLC), determined by both height and sex, could be a more accurate functional estimation of thoracic size. Size-matching criteria based on height versus predicted TLC was retrospectively evaluated, and, furthermore, whether a TLC mismatch was related to clinical and functional complications. The ratio of donor and recipient height, as well as the ratio of predicted TLC in donors and recipients, were calculated in 80 patients after bilateral lung transplantation. Complications evaluated included persistent atelectasis, persistent pneumothorax and increased number of days in intensive care, occurrence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and limitation of exercise capacity. Median height donor/recipient ratio was 1.01 (0.93-1.12). Median predicted TLC donor/recipient ratio was 1.01 (with a clearly broader range 0.72-1.41). Neither sex mismatch nor TLC mismatch were related to clinical or functional complications. Allocation of donor lungs based upon height alone leads to a substantial mismatch in total lung capacity caused by sex mismatch. The absence of complications suggests that a greater height donor/recipient discrepancy can be accepted for allocation than previously assumed.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources