A survey of the in-hospital response to cardiac arrest on general wards in the hospitals of Rome

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the response to cardiac arrest in general wards.

Methods: Direct interview with the cardiac arrest team (CAT) members in 32 hospitals in Rome, Italy.

Results: The majority of CATs are activated by telephone but only two (6%) hospitals have a dedicated telephone number for emergency calls. The CAT always includes a physician, who is usually an anaesthesiologist (30 hospitals, 94%), and usually includes one or two other members (23 hospitals, 72%). In 21 hospitals (65%) there is less than one defibrillator per floor but in only six hospitals (19%), CATs are equipped with defibrillators. Resuscitation guidelines are adopted by 15 teams (47%). The Utstein style of data collection is used in only one hospital. The most common problems reported by the CATs are: insufficient training of ward personnel (29 hospitals, 91%), insufficient staff (19 hospitals, 59%) and insufficient equipment (18 hospitals, 56%). Average maximum arrival time for the CAT to arrive is 220 s, but varies significantly between single-building and the multiple-building hospitals (88 vs. 390 s; P<0.001).

Conclusions: The majority of the cardiac arrest teams have acceptable response times, but their efficiency may be impaired by the lack of staff, equipment and co-ordination with the ward personnel. CAT members identified a strong need for BLS training of ward personnel. More widespread introduction of standard protocols for resuscitation and reporting of cardiac arrest are necessary to evaluate aspects that may need improvement.