Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons
- PMID: 12507007
- PMCID: PMC1284903
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-333
Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons
Abstract
Pigeons' key pecks were reinforced in the presence of pictures from one of two categories, cats or cars. A single picture associated with reinforcement was used in Experiment 1, and 20 pictures from the same category were associated with reinforcement in Experiment 2. Pigeons then were presented with novel test pictures from the training category and from the other, previously unseen, category. During Session 1 of testing, pigeons pecked no more often at pictures from the reinforced category than at pictures from the previously unseen category. When pigeons were trained with pictures associated with reinforcement or its absence from different categories in Experiment 3, differential responding to novel pictures from different categories appeared during Session 1. These findings argue against a process of automatic stimulus generalization within natural categories and in favor of the position that category distinctions are not made until members of at least two categories are compared with one another.
Similar articles
-
Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).J Comp Psychol. 2007 Feb;121(1):22-33. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.1.22. J Comp Psychol. 2007. PMID: 17324072
-
Effects of stimulus manipulations on visual categorization in pigeons.Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Mar 8. Behav Processes. 2006. PMID: 16616817
-
Degree of representation of the matching concept in pigeons (Columba livia).J Comp Psychol. 2003 Sep;117(3):246-56. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.246. J Comp Psychol. 2003. PMID: 14498800
-
The influence of landmark stability on control by occasion setters.Behav Processes. 2017 Apr;137:84-97. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 11. Behav Processes. 2017. PMID: 28088553 Review.
-
Modeling within-session dynamics of categorical and item-memory mechanisms in pigeons.Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1420-1444. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02416-w. Epub 2023 Dec 7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024. PMID: 38062316 Review.
Cited by
-
Error-driven learning in visual categorization and object recognition: a common-elements model.Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):349-81. doi: 10.1037/a0018695. Psychol Rev. 2010. PMID: 20438230 Free PMC article.
-
Matching based on biological categories in Orangutans (Pongo abelii) and a Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).PeerJ. 2013 Sep 10;1:e158. doi: 10.7717/peerj.158. eCollection 2013. PeerJ. 2013. PMID: 24058886 Free PMC article.
-
Naming and categorization in young children: II. Listener behavior training.J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 May;81(3):267-88. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81-267. J Exp Anal Behav. 2004. PMID: 15357510 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.Front Neural Circuits. 2014 Oct 13;8:122. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00122. eCollection 2014. Front Neural Circuits. 2014. PMID: 25352784 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous