Toward a re-definition of subthreshold bipolarity: epidemiology and proposed criteria for bipolar-II, minor bipolar disorders and hypomania
- PMID: 12507746
- DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00322-1
Toward a re-definition of subthreshold bipolarity: epidemiology and proposed criteria for bipolar-II, minor bipolar disorders and hypomania
Abstract
Background: The boundaries of bipolarity have been expanding over the past decade. Using a well characterized epidemiologic cohort, in this paper our objectives were: (1). to test the diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV hypomania, (2). to develop and validate criteria for the definition of softer expressions of bipolar-II (BP-II) disorder and hypomania, (3). to demonstrate the prevalence, clinical validity and comorbidity of the entire soft bipolar spectrum.
Methods: Data on the continuum from normal to pathological mood and overactivity, collected from a 20-year prospective community cohort study of young adults, were used. Clinical validity was analysed by family history, course and clinical characteristics, including the association with depression and substance abuse.
Results: (1). Just as euphoria and irritability, symptoms of overactivity should be included in the stem criterion of hypomania; episode length should probably not be a criterion for defining hypomania as long as three of seven signs and symptoms are present, and a change in functioning should remain obligatory for a rigorous diagnosis. (2). Below that threshold, 'hypomanic symptoms only' associated with major or mild depression are important indicators of bipolarity. (3). A broad definition of bipolar-II disorder gives a cumulative prevalence rate of 10.9%, compared to 11.4% for broadly defined major depression. A special group of minor bipolar disorder (prevalence 9.4%) was identified, of whom 2.0% were cyclothymic; pure hypomania occurred in 3.3%. The total prevalence of the soft bipolar spectrum was 23.7%, comparable to that (24.6%) for the entire depressive spectrum (including dysthymia, minor and recurrent brief depression).
Limitation: A national cohort with a larger number of subjects is needed to verify the numerical composition of the softest bipolar subgroups proposed herein.
Conclusion: The diagnostic criteria of hypomania need revision. On the basis of its demonstrated clinical validity, a broader concept of soft bipolarity is proposed, of which nearly 11% constitutes the spectrum of bipolar disorders proper, and another 13% probably represent the softest expression of bipolarity intermediate between bipolar disorder and normality.
Comment in
-
Clinical and family history markers of bipolar II disorder.Can J Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;48(3):208-9; auhthor reply 209-10. doi: 10.1177/070674370304800311. Can J Psychiatry. 2003. PMID: 12728747 No abstract available.
-
A downscaled practical measure of mood lability as a screening tool for bipolar II.J Affect Disord. 2005 Feb;84(2-3):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2003.09.010. J Affect Disord. 2005. PMID: 15708420
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
