Coronary angiography in the fully anticoagulated patient: the transradial route is successful and safe
- PMID: 12508189
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10374
Coronary angiography in the fully anticoagulated patient: the transradial route is successful and safe
Abstract
The radial approach to coronary angiography is intuitively attractive for fully anticoagulated patients (INR > 2) but no data exist concerning efficacy or safety of this procedure. The consensus view is that the femoral approach is contraindicated in fully anticoagulated patients, and though some operators undertake femoral catheterization in such patients and use closure devices, there are no data to suggest that it is safe to do so. At our institution, the radial approach for coronary angiography is reserved for patients in whom there is a relative contraindication to the femoral route. We have undertaken over 600 radial coronary angiograms in such patients since 1996, 66 of whom underwent transradial catheterization specifically because of anticoagulation status (INR > 2). Thirty-eight patients (58%) were male, average age 67 +/- 11 years. All 66 patients had an INR > 2 but < 4.5. The approach was left radial in 26 (39%), right radial in the remainder; sheath size was 4 Fr in 4 (6%), 5 Fr in 13 (20%), and 6 Fr in 49 (74%). Seven operators in total were involved, though two operators undertook the majority of cases (47; 71%). Success rate was 97%, with no failure of access, and only one minor postprocedural hemorrhage. Failures were due to radial artery atherosclerosis (1) and subclavian tortuosity (1). The radial approach to coronary angiography is safe and to be recommended in the fully anticoagulated patient.
Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Transradial coronary angiography in patients with contraindications to the femoral approach: an analysis of 500 cases.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Jan;61(1):60-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10708. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004. PMID: 14696161
-
Radial versus femoral access for orally anticoagulated patients.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct 1;76(4):493-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22527. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. PMID: 20882651 Clinical Trial.
-
Transradial right and left heart catheterizations: a comparison to traditional femoral approach.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):585-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20678. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006. PMID: 16532498
-
Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: indications, success rates & clinical outcome.Indian Heart J. 2010 May-Jun;62(3):218-20. Indian Heart J. 2010. PMID: 21275296 Review.
-
[Is the Allen test still useful in patients undergoing transradial cardiac coronary angiography?].Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2013 Dec;62(6):419-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 22. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2013. PMID: 24200351 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Procedural sedation during transradial coronary angiography to prevent spasm.Herz. 2016 Aug;41(5):435-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-015-4373-5. Epub 2015 Nov 23. Herz. 2016. PMID: 26598418 Clinical Trial. English.
-
The safety and feasibility of guidezilla catheter in complex coronary interventions and an observational study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(40):e8172. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008172. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 28984768 Free PMC article.
-
Transcarpal cardiac catheterization.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Oct;106(42):685-91. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0685. Epub 2009 Oct 16. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009. PMID: 19946437 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Repeated transradial catheterization: feasibility, efficacy, and safety.Tex Heart Inst J. 2014 Dec 1;41(6):575-8. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-13-4000. eCollection 2014 Dec. Tex Heart Inst J. 2014. PMID: 25593518 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative study of the radial and femoral artery approaches for diagnostic coronary angiography.Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2009 Dec;9(3):272-8. Epub 2009 Dec 19. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2009. PMID: 21509310 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical