Clean indoor air: where, why, and how
- PMID: 12508507
Clean indoor air: where, why, and how
Abstract
Clean indoor air policies are an effective way to eliminate exposure to second hand smoke and reduce smoking among youth and adults; they are strongly recommended by the Surgeon General and the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. How these policies are put into effect and at what level of government can make a difference. Legislation that preempts local action prevents communities from enacting more stringent laws or tailoring laws to address community-specific issues. Preemptive state laws also can be a barrier to local enforcement because communities not involved in decision making may be less aware of laws, may have no enforcement mechanism, and thus may be less complaint. Preemption is clearly a tobacco industry strategy to take away local control, usually in exchange for a weak law offering little protection from second hand smoke. As communities across the country continue to pass stronger local ordinances, eliminating preemptive laws becomes more important. During 2002, Delaware became the first state to repeal clean air preemption. In Iowa, the attorney general's office has been involved in the determination of whether the state clean air law prevents communities from passing more stringent ordinances. And although Minnesota's pioneer Clean Indoor Air Act does not preempt local laws, the debate over preemption there has not ended but instead has taken new forms.
Similar articles
-
Preemptive state smoke-free indoor air laws--United States, 1999-2004.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 Mar 18;54(10):250-3. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005. PMID: 15772586
-
Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA).Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):26-34. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.26. Tob Control. 2002. PMID: 11891365 Free PMC article.
-
An Association Between State Laws Limiting Local Control and Community Smoke-Free Indoor Air in the United States.J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241280905. doi: 10.1177/21501319241280905. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024. PMID: 39279342 Free PMC article.
-
Preemption of local smoke-free air ordinances: the implications of judicial opinions for meeting national health objectives.J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):403-12, 214. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00284.x. J Law Med Ethics. 2008. PMID: 18547209 Review.
-
The economic impact of clean indoor air laws.CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Nov-Dec;57(6):367-78. doi: 10.3322/CA.57.6.367. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007. PMID: 17989131 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of state preemption of local smoking restrictions on public health protections and changes in social norms.J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:632629. doi: 10.1155/2012/632629. Epub 2012 May 10. J Environ Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22654921 Free PMC article.
-
Policy-driven tobacco control.Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i16-20. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030718. Tob Control. 2010. PMID: 20382645 Free PMC article.
-
Competing initiatives: a new tobacco industry strategy to oppose statewide clean indoor air ballot measures.Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):430-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.138461. Epub 2009 Jan 15. Am J Public Health. 2009. PMID: 19150904 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of industry responsibility and tobacco control policy by US tobacco company executives in trial testimony.Tob Control. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv98-106. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.009647. Tob Control. 2006. PMID: 17130631 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials