doi: 10.1126/science.299.5603.26a.
Intellectual property. Universities ask Supreme Court to reverse patent ruling
- PMID: 12511618
- DOI: 10.1126/science.299.5603.26a
Item in Clipboard
Intellectual property. Universities ask Supreme Court to reverse patent ruling
Science.
.
No abstract available
Comment in
-
Patents and the research exemption.Science. 2003 Feb 7;299(5608):821-2. doi: 10.1126/science.299.5608.821c. Science. 2003. PMID: 12574602 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Intellectual property. Appeals court clears way for academic suits.Science. 2001 Jul 20;293(5529):411-3. doi: 10.1126/science.293.5529.411b. Science. 2001. PMID: 11463890 No abstract available.
-
Who owns federally funded research? The Supreme court and the Bayh-Dole act.N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 29;365(13):1167-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109168. Epub 2011 Aug 31. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21879888 No abstract available.
-
Supreme Court ruling prompts universities to tighten employee contracts.Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Aug 5;29(8):678. doi: 10.1038/nbt0811-678. Nat Biotechnol. 2011. PMID: 21822232 No abstract available.
-
An overview of a recent court challenge to the protection of biomarkers as intellectual property.Clin Chim Acta. 2011 May 12;412(11-12):802-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.01.024. Epub 2011 Feb 20. Clin Chim Acta. 2011. PMID: 21315704 Review.
-
The university-promoted patent at the crossroads of the research results and immediate industrial use.Biomol Eng. 2007 Feb;24(1):43-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bioeng.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 May 27. Biomol Eng. 2007. PMID: 16890015 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
