Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Dec;24(6):217-23.
doi: 10.1023/a:1021808923928.

Data collection methods for analyzing the quality of the dispensing in pharmacies

Affiliations
Review

Data collection methods for analyzing the quality of the dispensing in pharmacies

Francisco Caamaño et al. Pharm World Sci. 2002 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To review and discuss the advantages and limitations of the different data collection methods for analyzing the dispensing quality in community pharmacies.

Methods: A bibliographic search was carried out in MEDLINE (1980-2000). Articles with Medical Subject Heading (Mesh) "pharmacies" written in English and Spanish that evaluated the quality of dispensing (structure, process or outcome) were selected.

Results: Various data collection methods were observed. To analyze the quality of the structure, questionnaires and pharmacist interviews were used. To analyze the quality of the process, self-completed records, external observers and simulated clients were used. For analyzing the quality of the outcome, questionnaires, client interviews, and biologic samples were collected.

Conclusions: The analysis of quality of structure can be useful as a first approach, however, this method may lack sensitivity. On the other hand, the analysis of outcome may be excessively complex and difficult to use, except for experimental or observational studies with large resources. Therefore, an analysis of the quality of the process is the best option. Methods utilizing external observers and simulated clients may best conjugate both internal and external validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gac Sanit. 2000 Jul-Aug;14(4):294-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1984 Jun;41(6):1140-6 - PubMed
    1. Aten Primaria. 2000 Dec;26(10):700-2 - PubMed
    1. Aten Primaria. 1993 Feb 1;11(2):70-4 - PubMed
    1. Am Pharm. 1993 Mar;NS33(3):46-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources