Quality markers of drug information on the Internet: an evaluation of sites about St. John's wort

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate websites about St. John's wort for the quality of their content, including accuracy as reflected by statement of correct indication and mentioning of interacting drugs, the presence of formal criteria as reflected by adherence to published standards for health information on the Internet, and the validity of individual formal criteria as markers of content quality.

Subjects and methods: The Internet was searched with the metasearch engine WebFerret for sites about St. John's wort. A cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of randomly selected sites (n = 208) was performed. The main outcomes were the percentage of sites fulfilling the two criteria of content quality, the percentage of sites exhibiting eight formal criteria, and the associations between formal criteria and criteria of content quality, as determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Twenty-two percent (n = 45) of the websites correctly listed depression as the only indication for use of St. John's wort, and 22% (n = 46) identified at least one drug interaction with St. John's wort. Citing scientific publications was associated with mentioning the correct indication (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4 to 14) and mentioning of any interacting drug (OR = 6.0; 95% CI: 2.0 to 18). Absence of financial interest was associated with mentioning the correct indication (OR = 5.4; 95% CI: 2.2 to 14) and interacting drugs (OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2 to 7.7).

Conclusion: The content quality of sites about St. John's wort was generally poor. Our results suggest that Internet users should prefer noncommercial sites that reference the information to scientific publications when searching for drug information.