Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002;3(6):283-9.
doi: 10.1038/sj.thj.6200196.

Variable prognostic value of FLT3 internal tandem duplications in patients with de novo AML and a normal karyotype, t(15;17), t(8;21) or inv(16)

Affiliations

Variable prognostic value of FLT3 internal tandem duplications in patients with de novo AML and a normal karyotype, t(15;17), t(8;21) or inv(16)

Birgit Kainz et al. Hematol J. 2002.

Abstract

Introduction: Internal tandem duplication of the FLT3 gene (FLT3/ITD) has been linked to poor outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the prognostic value of FLT3/ITD in various cytogenetic risk groups is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance in patients with de novo AML and a normal karyotype or a t(15;17), t(8;21) or inv(16) (good risk group).

Patients and methods: Diagnostic samples of 100 patients were investigated by single-step PCR of exons 11 and 12 of the FLT3 gene in a single center retrospective analysis. Subgroups included 53 patients with normal karyotype, 21 patients with t(15;17), 9 patients with t(8;21) and 17 patients with inv(16).

Results: FLT3/ITD was found in 26 out of 100 patients: 30% of patients with a normal karyotype and 38% of t(15;17) patients tested positive. The complete remission (CR) rates for the ITD(+) or ITD(-) groups were 50 vs 76% in normal karyotypes, and 100 vs 53% in t(15;17) patients, while the relapse rates were 75 vs 25% in normal karyotypes and 50 vs 42% in t(15;17) patients. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) at 5 years were significantly different in patients with normal cytogenetics: ITD(+) vs ITD(-): OS 6 vs 28% (P<0.003); DFS 13 vs 41% (P<0.02) Interestingly, FLT3/ITD had no significant effect on the outcome of t(15;17) patients: ITD(+) vs ITD(-): OS 85 vs 53% (P=0.056), DFS 45 vs 60% (P=0.6) at 50 months.

Conclusions: These data suggest a high prognostic value of FLT3/ITD in patients with normal cytogenetics. However, we find no evidence that FLT3/ITD is a predictive marker for patients with t(15;17).

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources