Attitudes toward genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis among a group of individuals with physical disabilities
- PMID: 12530456
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1009412025722
Attitudes toward genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis among a group of individuals with physical disabilities
Abstract
Few studies have been published on the attitudes of people with physical disabilities toward genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis. Articles in the lay press and social science literature on this topic, mainly written by disability rights activists and advocates, imply opposition to prenatal diagnosis and the field of clinical genetics by the physically disabled population. In this study, 15 adults with physical disabilities were interviewed regarding their attitudes toward genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis. Genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis were generally viewed favorably by this sample of the disability community. Only a small percentage of the sample perceived genetics to be eugenic. Implications for genetic counseling and future research are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Eugenics is alive and well: a survey of genetic professionals around the world.Sci Context. 1998 Autumn-Winter;11(3-4):493-510. doi: 10.1017/s0269889700003173. Sci Context. 1998. PMID: 15168676
-
Australasian genetic counselors' attitudes toward disability and prenatal testing: Findings from a cross-sectional survey.J Genet Couns. 2024 Aug;33(4):822-833. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1788. Epub 2023 Sep 21. J Genet Couns. 2024. PMID: 37735951
-
Genetic counseling practices in Germany: a comparison between East German and West German geneticists.J Genet Couns. 1997 Mar;6(1):61-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1025663902714. J Genet Couns. 1997. PMID: 11660392 No abstract available.
-
Disability and genetics in the era of genomic medicine.Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Oct;9(10):797-802. doi: 10.1038/nrg2453. Nat Rev Genet. 2008. PMID: 18762801 Review.
-
Feminist criticism of prenatal diagnosis: a response.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;36(3):541-67. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199309000-00012. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8403604 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.Birth Defects Res. 2020 Mar 1;112(4):332-338. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1651. Birth Defects Res. 2020. PMID: 32115901 Free PMC article.
-
Imagined futures: how experiential knowledge of disability affects parents' decision making about fetal abnormality.Health Expect. 2012 Jun;15(2):139-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00672.x. Epub 2011 May 30. Health Expect. 2012. PMID: 21624022 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Issues Surrounding Clinical Exome Sequencing in the Prenatal Setting.J Genet Couns. 2018 Sep;27(5):1228-1237. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0245-5. Epub 2018 Mar 10. J Genet Couns. 2018. PMID: 29525930
-
Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0265-1. Online ahead of print. J Genet Couns. 2018. PMID: 29909595
-
"This lifetime commitment": Public conceptions of disability and noninvasive prenatal genetic screening.Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Feb;170A(2):363-374. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37459. Epub 2015 Nov 14. Am J Med Genet A. 2016. PMID: 26566970 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical