The effects of intermittent vision on prehension under binocular and monocular viewing
- PMID: 12536161
- DOI: 10.1123/mcj.7.1.46
The effects of intermittent vision on prehension under binocular and monocular viewing
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of intermittent binocular and monocular vision on the preparation and execution of the transport and grasp phases of prehension, and hence the temporal limit of binocular and monocular integration. Participants in two groups (speed or accuracy) performed prehensile movements of two amplitudes (20 and 40 cm) to either a large or small object (6 x 6 x 2 and 6 x 4x 2 cm) under conditions of binocular and monocular viewing. The interval between visual samples was manipulated with liquid crystal goggles (continuous vision, 20on/60off, and 20on/120off ms). A kinematic analysis indicated that participants modified variables associated with the preparation and execution of prehension in the intermittent vision conditions when instructed to emphasize accuracy. Participants instructed to emphasize speed, modified variables associated with the preparation phase only. The impact of intermittent vision was similar under binocular and monocular viewing. Thus, for prehension, it appears that consecutive binocular or monocular samples need to occur less than 60 ms apart in order to be fully integrated for limb control.
Similar articles
-
When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.Exp Brain Res. 2004 Oct;158(3):317-27. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1905-2. Epub 2004 May 26. Exp Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15164152
-
Intermittent vision and one-handed catching: the temporal limits of binocular and monocular integration.Motor Control. 2003 Oct;7(4):378-87. Motor Control. 2003. PMID: 14999135
-
Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.Exp Brain Res. 2015 Dec;233(12):3489-505. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4421-7. Epub 2015 Aug 23. Exp Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 26298046
-
Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.Exp Brain Res. 2019 May;237(5):1239-1255. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05503-4. Epub 2019 Mar 8. Exp Brain Res. 2019. PMID: 30850853 Free PMC article.
-
Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems.Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jan;130(1):35-47. doi: 10.1007/s002210050004. Exp Brain Res. 2000. PMID: 10638439
Cited by
-
Anticipatory action planning in blind and sighted individuals.Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 17;7:44617. doi: 10.1038/srep44617. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28304373 Free PMC article.
-
Intercepting a moving target: On-line or model-based control?J Vis. 2017 May 1;17(5):12. doi: 10.1167/17.5.12. J Vis. 2017. PMID: 28538992 Free PMC article.
-
On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action.Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):190-202. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 20. Vision Res. 2015. PMID: 25454700 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Temporal integration limits of stereovision in reaching and grasping.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jul;189(1):91-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1407-8. Epub 2008 May 21. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18493755
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources