Effects of instrumentation time on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements
- PMID: 12540118
Effects of instrumentation time on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of instrumentation time on the microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs). Class V cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual/ palatal surfaces of 64 freshly extracted non-carious premolars. The cavities on each tooth were restored with Fuji II LC (FT [GC]) and Photac-Fil Quick (PF [3M-ESPE]). The restored teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 32 teeth. Finishing/polishing was done immediately after light-polymerization in one group and was delayed for one week in the other group. The following finishing/polishing systems were evaluated: (a) Robot Carbides (RC); (b) SuperSnap (SS); (c) OneGloss (OG) and (d) CompoSite Polishers (CS). The sample size for each instrumentation time, material and finishing/polishing system combination was 8. Storage medium for both immediate and delayed instrumentation groups was distilled water at 37 degrees C during the hiatus period. The teeth were subsequently subjected to dye penetration testing (0.5% basic fushcin), sectioned and scored. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests at significance level 0.05. For PF, significant difference in enamel leakage was observed between immediate and delayed instrumentation with SS and CS. Significant differences in dentin leakage were also observed between the two instrumentation times for SS. For FT, significant differences in leakage between instrumentation times were observed only in dentin and with RC. Where significant differences in dye penetration scores existed, delayed finishing/polishing resulted in less microleakage.
Similar articles
-
Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.Oper Dent. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):36-41. Oper Dent. 2003. PMID: 12540116 Clinical Trial.
-
Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing systems.Oper Dent. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(4):381-6. Oper Dent. 2002. PMID: 12120776 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Sep;86(3):309-14. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.116133. J Prosthet Dent. 2001. PMID: 11552169
-
Review: finishing and polishing procedures of (resin-modified) glass ionomers and compomers in paediatric dentistry.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007 Mar;8(1):22-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03262566. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007. PMID: 17394887 Review.
-
Sealing Ability of Nano-ionomer in Primary Teeth: An ex vivo Study.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):209-213. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1365. Epub 2016 Sep 27. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016. PMID: 27843251 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous