Efficacy of passive acoustic screening: implications for the design of imager and MR-suite
- PMID: 12541235
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10251
Efficacy of passive acoustic screening: implications for the design of imager and MR-suite
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of passive acoustic screening in the magnetic resonance (MR) environment by reducing direct and indirect MR-related acoustic noise, both from the patient's and health worker's perspective.
Materials and methods: Direct acoustic noise refers to sound originating from the inner and outer shrouds of the MR imager, and indirect noise to acoustic reflections from the walls of the MR suite. Sound measurements were obtained inside the magnet bore (patient position) and at the entrance of the MR imager (health worker position). Inner and outer shrouds and walls were lined with thick layers of sound insulation to eliminate the direct and indirect acoustic pathways. Sound pressure levels (SPLs) and octave band frequencies were acquired during various MR imaging sequences at 1.5 T.
Results: Inside the magnet bore, direct acoustic noise radiating from the inner shroud was most relevant, with substantial reductions of up to 18.8 dB when using passive screening of the magnetic bore. At the magnet bore entrance, blocking acoustic noise from the outer shroud and reflections showed significant reductions of 4.5 and 2.8 dB, respectively, and 9.4 dB when simultaneously applied. Inner shroud coverage contributed minimally to the overall SPL reduction.
Conclusion: Maximum noise reduction by passive acoustic screening can be achieved by reducing direct sound conduction through the inner and outer shrouds. Additional measures to optimize the acoustic properties of the MR suite have only little effect.
Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Importance of bone-conducted sound transmission on patient hearing in the MR scanner.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jul;22(1):163-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20341. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005. PMID: 15971178
-
The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.Acta Paediatr. 2009 Aug;98(8):1278-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01339.x. Epub 2009 May 8. Acta Paediatr. 2009. PMID: 19432831 Clinical Trial.
-
Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.Nagoya J Med Sci. 2007 Jan;69(1-2):23-8. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2007. PMID: 17378177
-
Hardware considerations for MR imaging physics.Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1999 Nov;7(4):733-63, vi. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1999. PMID: 10631676 Review.
-
Noise in ICUs: Review and Detailed Analysis of Long-Term SPL Monitoring in ICUs in Northern Spain.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 22;22(23):9038. doi: 10.3390/s22239038. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36501740 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of image quality characteristics on Silent MR versus conventional MR imaging of brain lesions at 3 Tesla.Br J Radiol. 2016 Nov;89(1067):20150801. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150801. Epub 2016 Oct 5. Br J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27626958 Free PMC article.
-
Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.Hum Brain Mapp. 2003 Nov;20(3):123-41. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10134. Hum Brain Mapp. 2003. PMID: 14601139 Free PMC article. Review.
-
FMRI scanner noise interaction with affective neural processes.PLoS One. 2013 Nov 18;8(11):e80564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080564. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24260420 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous