Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Jan;5(1):38-44.
doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1326.2003.00239.x.

Influence of treatment with acarbose or glibenclamide on insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Influence of treatment with acarbose or glibenclamide on insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients

S Fischer et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2003 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of our double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to compare the effect of acarbose and glibenclamide on the insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes.

Methods: We investigated 77 patients (mean age 58.7 years, mean BMI 27.3 kg/m2), treated by diet alone for at least 4 weeks. The subjects were randomized into three treatment groups for 16 weeks: 100 mg t.i.d. acarbose (n = 25) or 1 mg t.i.d. glibenclamide (n = 27) or one t.i.d. placebo (n = 25). Before and after therapy, the levels of fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, fasting insulin, plasma glucose and insulin 1 h after a standardized breakfast were measured and insulin sensitivity determined by euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp test.

Results: After the treatment period, BMI in the acarbose and placebo group decreased significantly, whereas in the glibenclamide group a significant increase was observed. Fasting plasma glucose was only significant reduced under glibenclamide. The postprandial glucose decreased significantly after acarbose (13.8 vs. 11.4 mmol/l, p < 0.05) and glibenclamide treatment (14.6 vs. 11.4 mmol/l, p < 0.05) and was unchanged under placebo (13.8 vs. 13.7 mmol/l). The fasting insulin levels remained unchanged in all three groups, whereas postprandial insulin values increased significantly under glibenclamide. Neither acarbose nor glibenclamide significantly changed insulin sensitivity [acarbose: glucose disposal rate before treatment 2.3 mg/kg body weight/min/insulin, after treatment 3.2; glibenclamide 2.2 vs. 2.1; placebo 2.6 vs. 3.0].

Conclusions: Our results show a more substantial improvement of glucose control under glibenclamide than under acarbose which, however, was not associated with an increase of insulin sensitivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources