Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jan 23:3:2.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-3-2. Epub 2003 Jan 23.

Time series modeling for syndromic surveillance

Affiliations

Time series modeling for syndromic surveillance

Ben Y Reis et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) based syndromic surveillance systems identify abnormally high visit rates that may be an early signal of a bioterrorist attack. For example, an anthrax outbreak might first be detectable as an unusual increase in the number of patients reporting to the ED with respiratory symptoms. Reliably identifying these abnormal visit patterns requires a good understanding of the normal patterns of healthcare usage. Unfortunately, systematic methods for determining the expected number of (ED) visits on a particular day have not yet been well established. We present here a generalized methodology for developing models of expected ED visit rates.

Methods: Using time-series methods, we developed robust models of ED utilization for the purpose of defining expected visit rates. The models were based on nearly a decade of historical data at a major metropolitan academic, tertiary care pediatric emergency department. The historical data were fit using trimmed-mean seasonal models, and additional models were fit with autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) residuals to account for recent trends in the data. The detection capabilities of the model were tested with simulated outbreaks.

Results: Models were built both for overall visits and for respiratory-related visits, classified according to the chief complaint recorded at the beginning of each visit. The mean absolute percentage error of the ARIMA models was 9.37% for overall visits and 27.54% for respiratory visits. A simple detection system based on the ARIMA model of overall visits was able to detect 7-day-long simulated outbreaks of 30 visits per day with 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity. Sensitivity decreased with outbreak size, dropping to 94% for outbreaks of 20 visits per day, and 57% for 10 visits per day, all while maintaining a 97% benchmark specificity.

Conclusions: Time series methods applied to historical ED utilization data are an important tool for syndromic surveillance. Accurate forecasting of emergency department total utilization as well as the rates of particular syndromes is possible. The multiple models in the system account for both long-term and recent trends, and an integrated alarms strategy combining these two perspectives may provide a more complete picture to public health authorities. The systematic methodology described here can be generalized to other healthcare settings to develop automated surveillance systems capable of detecting anomalies in disease patterns and healthcare utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fourier analysis. Fourier analysis of daily visit totals reveals strong weekly and yearly periodicities. Power is shown on the Y axis with frequency (1/day) shown on the X axis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Weekly patterns. Weekly ensemble average of daily visit totals, shown from Sunday through Saturday, reveal a peak in visits on the weekends.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Yearly patterns, total visits Yearly ensemble average of daily visit totals, shown from June through June, reveals an increase in visits during the winter months.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Yearly patterns, respiratory visits Yearly ensemble average of daily respiratory-related visit totals, shown from June through June, reveals peaks in visits during the fall, winter and spring.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forecast errors Forecast errors before (Figure 5) and after (Figure 6) ARIMA modeling of residuals.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forecast errors Forecast errors before (Figure 5) and after (Figure 6) ARIMA modeling of residuals.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Detection Sensitivity The detection performance of the system when tested with simulated outbreaks of various magnitudes. Sensitivity measures how many of the 233 simulated outbreaks were detected by the system at each magnitude. The specificity was held at 97%, corresponding to roughly one false alarm per month.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Considerations for distinguishing influenza-like illness from inhalational anthrax. JAMA. 2001;286:2537–9. - PubMed
    1. Batal H, et al. Predicting patient visits to an urgent care clinic using calendar variables. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:48–53. - PubMed
    1. Bowdish GE, et al. Using regression analysis to predict emergency patient volume at the Indianapolis 500 mile race. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:1200–3. - PubMed
    1. Hagen JA, et al. Associations between outdoor air pollutants and hospitalization for respiratory diseases. Epidemiology. 2000;11:136–40. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200003000-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Green MS, Kaufman Z. Surveillance for early detection and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks associated with bioterrorism. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002;4:503–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms